"dc-description","dc-title","Type","Collection","dc-creator","Id","dc-publisher","UserLevel","dc-date","Icon","Name","Chronology","dc-subject","Redirect"
"The room bounded by wall 366 and robbing trench 497 to the north (1006.00 N), wall 365 to the south (1002.10 N), and walls 332 to the east (262.07 E) and wall 306 to the west (258.01 E) was excavated between April 5 and April 20, 2012. This room is located approximately 10 meters south of the so-called Turkish House. Its earliest phases predate the 11th c CE when two walls (366 and 306) were built as part of a larger, unknown structure. Activity in the room continued through to the early modern period, when the north portion of wall 306 and the west portion of wall 366 were robbed out (497), and in the 18th century a bothros was placed in the middle of the room. In the intervening 700 years, layers of dumped fill were used to level out the space during the late 11th – early 12th c., and subsequently walls 332 and 365 were constructed to create the current space. This area was excavated under the supervision of Angele Rosenberg-Dimitracopoulou and Larkin Kennedy. We worked with a crew of workmen including Thanasis Notis (pickman, foreman), Vangelis Kollias (wheelbarrow man, screener), Thanos Kioseloglou (shovelman, replacement pickman), and occasionally Tasos Kakouros filled in for Thanasis Notis as pickman as well.; ; Pre-11th c CE; ; Wall 366 at 1007.00N, which extends from 260.40E to 262.20E, and wall 306 at 258E, which extends from 1004.78N to 1002.58N, were constructed prior to the 11th c CE. Wall 366 consists of fairly regular courses of large, squared blocks separated by tile. These courses continue unchanged throughout the visible elevations of the wall, and extend below the elevation reached at the end of session 1. Wall 306 is slightly smaller and is similarly constructed of fairly regular courses of large, squared blocks. ; ; Byzantine period; ; During the Byzantine period, this area was leveled out through the deposition of successive layers of dump fill. Three layers of dump fill (718 Lot 2012-16, 716, 713) were thrown in along the northern wall 366 during the 11th c CE. In the early 12th c CE, another layer of fill (711) was tossed into the room’s northern portion. These deposits included the disposal of glass and ceramic vessels, a glass bracelet, bone needles and pins, iron slag, nails, ceramic tile, faunal material, charcoal, and plaster. In context 718 were also disposed two bronze bracelets (MF 2012-10, 2012-12), one with a hook and eye closure and one composed of wire flattened at one end and wrapped around the wire body to form a ring for closure, as well as a shell bead, possibly made of mother of pearl, and incised with a starburst pattern (MF 2012-2).; ; These earlier deposits form a bowl allowing later fills to spill down in successive lenses away from walls 306 and 366. Later dump fills (711, 708, 690 Lot 2012-14, 685, 683 Lot 2012-15, 681, 677, 670, 660 Lot 2012-13, 650, 646 Pottery Lot 2012-13 Bone Lot 2012-2, 645) were successively laid around the room, probably also during the early 12th c CE. These deposits similarly included the disposal of glass and ceramic vessels, a waster, a bone awl and a pin, a stone tessera, a millstone fragment, an iron implement, iron nails, slag, and bloom, bronze, plaster, ceramic tile, faunal material, architectural revetment, mainly of marble but also of terracotta, and charcoal. A stamped amphora handle was kept from context 685, though not inventoried. Of note were coin 2012-13 (931-944 CE) and coin 2012-18 (969-1030 CE) from context 646, coin 2012-35 (976-1030 CE) and coin 2012-36 (945-950 CE) from context 690, and a bronze bracelet with a hook clasp (MF 2012-3) which was also retrieved from context 690.; ; In the southwestern corner of context 690, spreading to the east from wall 306, a cluster of large faunal bones (mainly bovid) was accompanied by large fragments of stewpots. This and other subtle differences in the dumping activity were explored with soil samples taken from contexts 646 and 690. Although clear changes in soil indicate that these fills are the result of years of dumping activity and not a single deposit, it is not possible to archaeologically distinguish between these events and the finds do not reveal a more precise chronology either. Few ceramic sherds joined, and none between contexts, indicating a large number of individual pots were represented, rather than many fragments representing a few vessels as would be expected in a primary deposit. These successive fills therefore appear to represent individual loads of dirt that should ultimately be considered part of the same protracted depositional event which leveled the area.; ; Later in the 12th c CE a drain (426) extending from 1011.75N/259.26E to 1004.97N/260.30E was cut into the early 12th c CE fill. Slabs of stone lined the walls of the drain and its floor was made of packed soil. The drain may continue south into the adjoining room, although this needs to be further explored. It also extends north into the Blue team’s area, where it appears to cut through wall 366. In previous excavation seasons, fill for the drain has been dated on the basis of the pottery to the 11th century, though it has also been considered to date to at least the Frankish period on the basis of stratigraphy (590, 591). The portion of the drain south of wall 366 still preserved coverstones, while that north of the wall only retained a few coverstones and displayed other signs that the northern portion of the drain had been exposed outside for a period of time prior to being covered by later depositional events. Stones from the drain’s walls were robbed out (between approximately 1007.00 N and 1006.00) as part of the robbing activity (c 497) that also makes determination of the exact relationship between drain 426 and wall 366 problematic, as stones were also removed from the northern portion of wall 306 and the portion of wall 366 close to where wall 366 and drain 426 would have met in antiquity. This robbing has been dated to the early modern period on the basis of its stratigraphic relationship with robbing trench 596.; ; Still later in the 12th c CE, wall 332, which extends from 1006.37N/262.38E to 999.90N/262.07E was built in order to create a smaller, interior space. This wall is constructed of roughly squared blocks with some tile demarcating the irregular courses. It rests on a foundation of spherical boulders that begin at elevation 86.35 at the north end and elevation 86.72 at the south end, and extend down to a depth of 86.23. These non-corbelled courses bell out wider than the finished wall face. At the time the wall was built, a foundation trench 654 was dug into the surrounding deposits of leveling fill. This trench contained the disposal of glass and ceramic vessels, a glass tube, bronze, marble, and iron. As the material contained in this trench dates to roughly the same time period as the deposits it is laid against, however, this foundation trench can be considered to have been filled by the same material as that which was dug up in order to provide a trench for wall 332’s foundation courses, and not by extraneous material. ; ; Even later in the 12th c CE, wall 365, extending from 1002.58N/257.89E to 1002.44N/261.99E, was constructed in order to subdivide this room and create two smaller interior spaces in place of one larger interior space. This wall was possibly constructed on top of drain 426, though the boulders partially exposed at elevation 86.70 require further attention in order to better understand this relationship, and whether these boulders can indeed be considered as part of the southern extend of the drain. In wall 365, large, roughly squared blocks rest on a foundation made up of a single course of rounded boulders extending to a maximum depth of 86.67. Threshold 664, consisting of a break in wall 365, joined this room to the room to the south and contained an iron needle (MF 2012-8) as well as an iron nail and body sherds from a glass vessel. Coin 2012-14 from the Late Byzantine period (1070-1075 CE) was found just below the two large stones preserved in the south-most portion of threshold 664. Threshold 536, made up of a single layer of crushed tile, provided access to the room from the east. This threshold was laid on the edge of existing stone courses of wall 332 and bridged the gap between this wall and wall 365. To the west of threshold 536, there was a concentration of carbon and bone with some sherds from glass vessels which could be associated with this doorway (641). An iron bloom was also saved from context 641, though not inventoried. A flotation sample was taken from both of these contexts as they could represent deposition associated with the use of the doorways, and which could be compared at a later date with the contents of flotation samples taken elsewhere in the room. ; ; Early Modern; ; In the 18th c CE, a bothros (346/671) was dug into the middle of room, cutting through all of the earlier leveling fill. It stretches from 1005.06N to 1003.84 N and 259.79E to 261.38 E. Four large, tabular stones capped the bothros on its northern side (346) to a depth of 86.81. Under the capstones, the interior of the bothros was lined with regular courses of rounded boulders until an elevation of 85.35 m (671). Under the stone courses is a thick white clay foundation layer which was not excavated. When it was dug, the bothros cut through the drain 426. Built into the regular courses of the structure was a large amount of tile that appears to have used glass slag as a temper. A sample was saved for further testing, as it may indicate the presence of glass making in the vicinity. A Byzantine coin (coin 48) from Thessalonika (1143-1180) was also built into the bothros wall (671). After the stone courses end at 85.35, the bothros belled out into a cavity wider at the bottom than at its mouth, and continued to an elevation of 83.90 m. It appeared to Thanasis Notis (the team’s pickman) that the bothros terminated at this point. ; ; When it went out of use, the bothros (346/671) was filled with a deposit taken from elsewhere around the site which contains a cohesive collection of Frankish material dating to the first half of the 13th c CE (726, 733, 739, 743) including glass and ceramic vessels, iron nails, iron slag and an antler. In addition to the relatively high volume of cooking and tableware, a significant concentration of faunal and fish bone and charcoal were included in the deposit. Two Byzantine coins were also included in the deposit, coin 2012-50 (1112- 1137 CE) and coin 2012-52 (1143- 1180 CE), a bronze token (originally assigned coin no. 2012-46), and two illegible coins (coin 2012-44 and 2012-49). This deposit appears, therefore, to be a secondary deposit of Frankish material that was thrown into the bothros, possibly when it was no longer necessary for storage. ; Sometime after the filling of the bothros, a pit (c431) was dug into it, cutting through both the southern end of the structure to a depth of 86.30. It stretches from 1004.35 N to 1002.43 N and 259.71E to 261.70E. It was filled with Frankish material (336 and 338) similar to that filling the bothros 671/346 (726, 733, 739, 743).; ; Further excavation is necessary to address four remaining questions. First, further excavation is necessary within bothros 346/671 in order to ensure that it does terminate. Thanasis Notis suggested that it might continue laterally to the north rather than down. Next, investigation of the room to the south would indicate whether drain 426 does in fact continue. Threshold 536 could also be removed in order to better determine the association of walls 332 and 365. Finally, more soil should be removed from within the room in order to determine a more precise chronology for walls 306 and 366.","Excavations of Nezi Field, SW area, Session 1 2012","Report","Corinth","","Corinth:Report:Nezi Field 2012 by Larkin Kennedy, Angele Rosenberg-Dimitracopoulou (2012-04-03 to 2012-04-20)","","","","","Nezi Field 2012 by Larkin Kennedy, Angele Rosenberg-Dimitracopoulou (2012-04-03 to 2012-04-20)","","Corinthia | Ancient Corinth | Central Area | Nezi Field",""
"EXCAVATION SUMMARY; We, Angela Ziskowski and Lina Kokkinou, from May 21 to June 9 2007 continued the excavation in the northern edge of the Nezi field, in the same excavation area opened by Lydia Herring, Josh Langseth, and Kris Lorenzo in the previous Corinth excavation sessions of 2007. We worked under the supervision of Guy Sanders, Ioulia Tzonou-Herbst, James Herbst, and Alicia Carter. We excavated with workmen Kleomenis Didaskalou, Vasilis Papanikolaou, (pick men), Vasilis Kollias, Iannis Oikonomou (shovel men), Andreas Oikonomou, and Vangelis Kollias (barrowmen). ; Our purpose was to continue the survey of the previous sessions, which extended as early as the Frankish strata, and to form a better opinion about the Frankish activities in the Nezi field and begin exploring earlier (Byzantine) activities in the area. Nevertheless during our work we also discovered traces of Early Modern activities.; ; ; BYZANTINE (610 to 1210 AD); We did not have enough time to work adequately with the Byzantine strata. We dug only a few baskets dated in Byzantine period and therefore it is too soon to form a final opinion about the Byzantine activities at the Nezi area.  However, it appears that a substantial grey, ashy layer (at least 6 meters in diameter) of Early or Middle Byzantine material will be exposed in 2008 which could very well represent some sort of industrial area (heavy burning) and would explain the large number of nails and iron lumps which were being excavated in this area this season. Nevertheless, on the basis of the evidence so far there was some activity in the Byzantine era in the southernmost part of the excavation area (1001.00N – ca 1006.00N) between ca 266.5 E and 274.00 E (B149, B161, B207, B215, B219, B 225, and 226). It is difficult to interpret B149 and B161 because they seem to extend further to the south of the limits of the excavation, and need to be evaluated in following sessions.  B226, a small oval depression seems to be directly above the substantial grey ashy layer which will be exposed in the 2008 excavation season which will most likely date to the Early (610-802 AD) or Middle Byzantine (802-1058 AD) periods.  B219, which is part of the fill of the foundation trench for the N-S wall at 269E, though small and incomplete, probably dates the construction of the N-S wall at 269E in the Middle Byzantine period on the basis of the pottery evidence. This wall was exposed in the previous sessions with B129 and B131 and was considered Frankish due to a coin of W. Villehardouin that was discovered in the fill covering the wall (B129). The presence of this coin can be explained by the use of this earlier wall by the Franks.  During the Late Byzantine period (1059-1210 AD) a small part of this wall that maybe included a threshold, was robbed (B207, B215). ; In addition, this N-S wall continued and was connected to an apsidal structure (that may have been added later based on limited exposure of the construction features) in the north (at 1008.60 N).  We excavated both the wall of this structure and the area within it.  While layers directly above the apse dated to the Late Byzantine or Byzantine NPD (B 176, 179, 213, 214), the construction of the apse clearly dates to the Middle Byzantine (B 206, 216, 217, and 222).  The upper layer of soil within the apse dated to the Frankish period (B 204), but the lower levels varied from Frankish to Middle Byzantine (B 208 and 209).  I suspect the reason for this is twofold; first, the lower levels of the interior of the building (I hesitate to call them floors since they were not level nor was there a deposit of material on them) are truly Byzantine and secondly, the area within the apse was partially excavated before wall itself which could have contaminated some of the material inside the structure.  ; Layers (B 218, 220, and 221) from the western edge of the apse and the western N-S wall (running along 266.00 E) of this building were dated to the Frankish period and will be dealt with in that section.; ; ; FRANKISH (1210-1458 AD); A significant amount of our work was dedicated in the area between N-S wall at 266E (revealed with B 65, B115, B117, B131, B137, and B139) and N-S wall at 269E (revealed with B129 and B138), and in the area West of the N-S wall at 266E. ; Courses of the western wall (running along 266.00 E) of this building were exposed in the north beyond the E-W crosswall (1006.00 to 1007.00 N) (B 218 and 220).  Moreover, it seems that the crosswall extended further to the west and under the western balk of the excavation (B 221) and may have been the northernmost point of the original structure.  However, the construction of the apse dates to the Byzantine period while most of the two N-S walls were exposed in Frankish levels.  Thus we are excavating a lower, earlier level of the apse (giving it an earlier date), it may be part of an earlier building onto which the later Frankish building levels were set, or it may simply be explained by the fact that the ground slopes downward from south to north.  ; Regarding the area between the N-S wall at 269E and the N-S wall at 266E, it became evident that at least in the Frankish period, the area was used as a room and that it was covered by a roof. As stated above, the N-S wall at 269E must have been constructed in Middle Byzantine period (802-1058 AD). There is no evidence yet about the use of the room in the Byzantine period (excluding the apse area which may be a separate structure), because we did not excavate below the Frankish strata in this area. This wall continued to be used by the Frankish population as the east wall of a roofed room. The west wall of the room was N-S wall at 266E.  The roof of the room suffered probably multiple destructions around the middle of the 13th century AD (B184, B210). We were able to trace the red floor of the room below the destruction in some areas of the room.; After the destruction of the room (B184, cut = B 191) a pit or well was created in the central West area of the room. This pit/well was used as a rubbish area for bones, tiles, stones etc. The digging of the pit/well was not completed in this session and its date is not secure (Frankish or Ottoman). ; It is very possible that the area west of the N-S wall at 266E and its threshold is also a room, because with B196 we discovered part of a wall and its robbing trench that runs in the N-S direction and is almost parallel to N-S wall at 266E. This wall stands immediately to the east of the western limit of the excavation at 263E. The hypothesis that the area between the two walls is a room is supported by the discovery of a small area of red soil, possibly a floor immediately to the west of the threshold of N-S wall at 266E. For definite conclusions about the activity in this area we have to extend the excavation area further to the west and also to study carefully the area to the north, where B141 and B142 were done.; A small partial roof destruction limited to the southeast of the threshold of N-S wall at 266E and dated to the first half of the 13th century AD can either belong to a roof of the area west of N-S wall at 266E, or to a roof of the room east of N-S wall earlier that that of B184. This small part of the roof could have slipped and fallen from the roof of a room  west of N-S wall at 266E in the area east of N-S wall at 266 E, then unroofed. It could also have fallen vertically down from a roof covering a room east of N-S wall at 266E.; East and north of the structure discussed extensive layers of fill were excavated exposing very few features.  These baskets of fill extended from 265.00 to 279.00 E and 1001.00 to 1013.82 N (B 172, 181, 200, 202, and 212).  In the southeastern corner of the excavation (274.00 to 279.00 E and 1002.00 to 1006.00 N) there were a number of layers that were clearly clay surfaces (B 165, 167, 175, and 185).  These layers consisted of a hard, packed clay on whose surface many finds laid.  Earlier in the season, channels (B 68) were exposed running across this space and it was suggested that these may have been irrigation channels.  However, it is now believed that it was not garden fill deposited in this area.  In addition, a small pit (B 183 and cut 186) was cut into these clay surfaces.  The material of this pit was dated to the second half of the 13th century, the same date as the clay surfaces.  Moreover, the relatively straight edges of the north (discussed below) and west edges of these surfaces suggest that they may have been at the edge of a building, if not necessarily inside.  ; In addition, a possible robbing trench was cut into the northern edge of these clay surfaces (B 173 and cut 182).  With the flat, clay surfaces jutting against this trench’s southern edge, it very well may represent the robbing of an E-W wall.  This trench (B 182) is also cut by another trench (B 111) which runs N-S.  Further consideration and excavation will be necessary to understand this area.; Even further to the north of this trench, we removed a martyr between a pit-like area (B 104) and a small wall (B 170).  We then removed the small cobble wall (B 199), dated to the second half of the 13th century, which was collapsing off the north edge of the Nezi excavations.  ; Throughout the central area of the excavations (269.00 to 274.00 E and 1001.00 to 1011 N) we removed a thick layer of soil that can be best described as silty (B 188, 223, and 227).  This soil contained little pottery (in comparison to other areas of fill here) and many bones.  Since there is a depression in the Nezi field at this point, it is reasonable to suppose that this soil was washed into place by rain or flooding.  Below it we were exposing a black/grey ashy layer which will be excavated at the beginning of the 2008 excavation season.  ; Above this silty soil, we removed one small clay patch (B 224) that jutted against the N-S wall which runs along 269.00 N.  In addition, two pits were cut through these levels.  The first (B 151 and cut 187) (at 271.00 to 272.00 E and 1002.00 to 1002.50 N) was exposed by B 140.  The second (cut B 193) was a substantial pit (270.00 to 271.80 E and 1007.00 to 1009.30 N) exposed by B 145 (the layer directly above B 188).  This pit (B 147, 148, 150, 153, 159, 160, and 163 = martyr) was dumped with fill that varied substantially in date although the latest material was dated to the Frankish period.  We stopped digging at B 160 after determining that it has cuttings into the bedrock for a well and that to continue any deeper would be dangerous and logistically difficult at present.  ; ; EARLY MODERN (1831-1949); This session’s survey did not add much to the evidence we had from the previous sessions about the Early Modern activities in the Nezi field (a property boundary wall, an ash pit, agricultural activity). In the Early Modern period part of N-S wall at 264E, which was revealed in B52 and B54, was robbed, as the pottery found in the robbing trench of the wall confirms (B 197, B 198, B 201).  In addition, a layer of soil (B 180) over a portion of this wall, which was left at higher level and not robbed as parts both south and north of it, suggesting it may be a different wall crossing this one) also dated to the early Modern period.; ; ; CONCLUSIONS; We have begun to uncover layers of Byzantine material in the Nezi excavations.  It appears that the lower levels of the walls and the interior fill of the only building exposed all belong to this period.  Moreover, the final days of excavation exposed a grey, ashy layer over a large area of the field which will almost certainly date to the Byzantine period once it is excavated next season.; The majority of the excavations carried out during this session were securely dated to Frankish contexts.  During this period we see a space being actively used in the southwest corner of the excavations, which may or may not be an interior room but further investigation will be required to determine this.  Also, human activity is visible within the structure.  At some point in the 13th century there are multiple destructions, after which a large pit is cut into the floor of the interior of the building.  ; Outside of this building, one finds several hard, clay surfaces in the southeastern corner of Nezi field.  These surfaces exposed finds laying flat upon them.  The trench cut to the north of them and the fact that the western edge of them is relatively straight suggests that they may indeed be floors of some sort.  In addition, the whole Nezi area north and east of the building seems to have been primarily covered in layers of fill under which a large silty layer had washed through the area.  This silty area seems to be dividing the Frankish and Byzantine deposits suggesting a possible period in which it was not used.  The numbers of iron nails and large iron lumps found throughout this area and the large ashy deposit made visible by the removal of this silty soil all suggest, in my opinion, that we are coming onto an exterior space used heavily for industrial purposes.  ; Several additional cuts (which may represent robbing trenches for walls) and deep pits make up the only other features in this area.  The large number of pits also suggests that this was an outdoor area.  ; Finally, the only significant evidence for the early Modern period in this session’s excavation include a number of layers which were removed from a robbed out wall that was exposed in the northwestern corner of the excavation.  I suspect that the wall itself dates to the Frankish period and it was robbed out during the Early Modern period.","Byzantine to Early Modern period in the southern end of Nezi Field","Report","Corinth","","Corinth:Report:Nezi Field 2007 by Lina Kokkinou and Angela Ziskowski (2007-05-21 to 2007-06-09)","","","","","Nezi Field 2007 by Lina Kokkinou and Angela Ziskowski (2007-05-21 to 2007-06-09)","","Corinthia | Ancient Corinth | Central Area | Nezi Field",""
"INTRODUCTION; ; In the past three weeks, we, Lydia Herring, Josh Langseth, and Kris Lorenzo, opened an area at the extreme north of the Nezi field under the supervision of Director of Excavation Guy Sanders and Site Supervisor Alicia Carter.  Nezi field is an orchard south of the area excavated by Henry S. Robinson in the 1960s south of the South Stoa in the Forum.  We worked with a crew of workmen including Kleomenis Didaskalou (pickman), Billy Papanikolaou (pickman), Andreas Oikonomou (pickman), Vassilis Kollias (shovelman), Iannis Oikonomou (shovelman), Andreas Didaskalou (barrowman), Vangelis Kollias (barrowman), Sotiris Raftopoulos (barrowman), and Thanasis Notis, the foreman. The original area we began to excavate on April 10, 2007 covered ca. 162 square meters located 263 E to 279 E and 1002 N to 1008 N (minimum) / 1013.85 N (maximum).  The northern edge of the excavation area is an escarpment left by the excavations of 1936 and 1961, and thus irregular. On Wednesday, April 18, we extended the excavation area to the south in order to find the limit of an orange clay feature at the southern boundary of the excavation area.  The addition covers 266 E to 271 E and 1002 N to 1001 N. The current excavation area thus covers ca. 167 square meters.  ; ; Our objective is to investigate Turkish, Frankish, and Byzantine remains and connect them to what was excavated in Agora SW section E (NB 227, 228, and 237) and section J (NB 254, 262, 267, 294) in 1961, along with the exploratory trench dug by Amyx and Morgan in 1936 at the southern extreme of the Giambourani field (the field just north of the Nezi field).; ; The entire excavation area is divided into two unequal parts by a wall running roughly E-W, which we are continuing to uncover. Within our excavation area, the wall is 16.28 m long, 0.57 m in width, and preserved to a maximum height of 0.55 m above ground.  Its maximum northing is 1011.70 N, and the minimum northing is approx. 1009.20 N, where it joins the northern scarp of the excavation area.  This wall continues past our excavation area both east and west, but is not preserved to the same height from 275.80 E to beyond the eastern edge of our excavation area, where it has collapsed, thus revealing the north scarp to the eye in this area.  It is constructed of field stones arranged in random courses with mud as a bonding agent.  This wall was presumably excavated in part by Amyx and Morgan in 1936 (NB 153, 154). ; ; This essay will describe the activity in our area in chronological order based upon our interpretation of the stratigraphy.  So far, our read pottery, coins, and small finds provide a date of Early Modern for most of our deposits.  This date coincides well with our interpretation of formation of the excavation area.; ; PRE-EARLY MODERN; ; The earliest activities in our excavation area are represented by an area of destruction debris consisting of densely-packed roof tile fragments lying horizontally on a clay surface (B51=B58=B59).  These tiles extend from 267.60 E to 271 E, and 1006.90 N to the southern edge of the excavation area, and may extend beyond it.  The tile scatter also contained worked marble fragments.  The tiles are scattered in a concentrated area, with their north and east extents noticeably rectilinear.  This deposit is dated by pottery to the Frankish period, ca. 1260-1280 CE.  South of this tile scatter is an orange clay feature (as yet unexcavated) surrounded on its north and northeast sides by stone blocks, on the very edge of which some of the tiles rest.  This feature (1004 N to 1001.53 N and 268.95 E to 267 E) contains orange clay, white clay, and gray clay. ; ; Based upon the presence of a tile scatter, fragments of worked stone, clay of three different colors, and worked blocks bordering the aforementioned clay, we have formulated three hypotheses: that the extant evidence indicates the destroyed remains of some sort of enclosure associated with 1) a hearth, 2) a potting installation, or 3) a floor(s).; ; This area of destruction debris is cut by a large pit or well (B36, B37, B39, B41, B43, B46; 1008.08 N to 1005.96, and 268.40 E to 266.40 E).  Five of the six lenses of fill of this pit or well are dated by pottery to the second Ottoman period (AD 1715 -1831) and may represent a filling in of this feature at that time.  IT is possible that this activity may be related to the large and well-built Ottoman house (the Giambourani House) previously excavated less that 10m to the NW of Nezi field.  The uppermost lens of fill (B36) in this pit or well contained Early Modern pottery and we suggest that this deposit may have been dumped into the pit in the Early Modern period to level out the surface of the ground in this area of the field as the settling of earlier dumped fills may have created a depression in the ground over time. We have temporarily ceased excavating this pit because it is 1.41 m deep and difficult for the workmen to climb in and out of; excavation will resume once the surrounding deposits have been excavated to a more manageable depth.; ; North of this area of destruction a robbing trench (B52/B54) has been excavated at 1011.5 – 1014N/264 – 264.85E.  This robbing trench was dug to partially rob a N-S running wall that continues into the previously excavated area to the north of Nezi field, thus linking the two areas.  Pottery from the fill of the robbing trench dates to the Frankish period, ca. AD 1300.  But further excavation is needed to establish a more reliable date based on the relations between the robbing trench and other deposits and features in the area.  Specifically, we want to know the relationship between the robbing trench and the E-W wall that may (or may not) cut it at ca. 1011.5N/264.5E.  We also want to excavate more of the deposits cut by the robbing trench to establish a more secure date.; ; EARLY MODERN; ; The Early Modern activity in the excavation area is agricultural in nature, consisting primarily of two phases of plowing and planting in the southern half of the excavation area.  The earlier phase was excavated with B23=B27=B30=B33=B34=B50=B57=B62 which overlay the entire excavation area.  The mixed nature of this soil and its lack of association with any built structures suggest to us that this is plow zone.  Several deposits excavated immediately under this zone also contained Early Modern pottery (B14, B36, B38, B44, B57=B61).  Based on their location at the northern down-slope end of the field and their relative depths, we suggest that these deposits were purposefully laid down to level the field for the planting of crops in this first phase of Early Modern agricultural activity.; ; The later phase of plowing was excavated with B2=B24, which overlay distinct plow furrows (the cuts of which were recorded with B22).  The furrows vary in length and width and run from the eastern extreme of the excavation area to the western extreme.  They first appear approximately one meter south of the E-W wall.; ; Associated with later phase of Early Modern agricultural activities is a linear pile of stones excavated with B4 (1009.70 N to 1010.90 N, and 264.70 to 272.66 E in its extremes).  This layer abuts the south face of the E-W wall and we suggest that it is a pile of field cobbles which farmers cleared from the field in the course of their agricultural activity to the south.  Since these cobbles predate the later phases of fencing (see below for B16, B17) between Nezi field and Giambourani field, we hypothesize that there was an earlier fence or field boundary, which B17 replaced, but has left no discernable trace.; ; Also associated with the later phase of Early Modern activity in Nezi field is a small pit (fill of this pit = B44) of dumped material including ash, sherds, cobbles and boulders.  ; ; MODERN; ; South of the E-W wall, a series of tree pits and irrigation trenches were cut into the second phase of Early Modern plow zone.  The irrigation trenches (B18 = B32, B19) comprise two linear cuts running north-south up to the south-west side of individual tree pits but not joining a specific tree pit (B18 ran up to B7/B10, B19 ran up to B11/B15).  Each trench contained a black plastic irrigation hose.  The irrigation trenches continue south out of the excavation area, and probably are connected with other tree pits within the existing orange orchard south of the excavation area.; ; The five tree pits in the excavation area are arranged in three north-south rows, ca. five meters apart.  Each of the tree pits (B6/B9, B7/B10, B8/B12, B11/B15, B21/B25) contained an orange tree and root system, all of which the workmen cleared; the workmen, most of whom have extensive agricultural experience, estimate the age of the trees to be no more than forty years old.  Each pit cuts the surface cut by plow furrows (furrows = B22) and the soil which the furrows cut (B23=B27=B30=B33=B34=B50).; ; Tree pit B6/B9 contained very dark black specially fertilized soil with small white polystyrene inclusions and small areas of yellowish white clay.  Both the specially fertilized soil and yellowish white clay would have been part of a mix of soil and other matter that surrounded the orange sapling when it was put in the pit. The clay and the polystyrene most likely functioned to retain moisture for the sapling.; ; Along both sides of the E-W wall are several fill deposits.  The uppermost on the north side of the wall (B3) contains worked marble fragments that may be the result of dumping from the 1936 excavation, or also (in this case) the later 1960’s excavations under H. Robinson in sections E and J (see NB228), north of the Nezi field.  South of the E-W wall are two fill deposits (B5, B14) that may perhaps be the result of terracing for agricultural activity.  However, the uppermost fill (B5) also included marble fragments, some of which were worked.  Because similar fragments also occur in the fill north of the E-W wall (B3)—which, along with B5, also directly borders Amyx and Morgan’s 1936 excavation trench in what was later called section E by Schmiel in 1961 (NB228)—we hypothesize that this fill is most likely fill dumped by the 1936 excavators.  Worked marble fragments have been found only in these two contexts in the area along the north scarp.; ; These fill deposits are cut by the latest activity in our excavation area: the construction of two phases of cement foundations used to anchor a series of posts supporting chain-link fencing.  This fencing runs along the northern boundary of Nezi field.  Both phases of fence foundations were partly cemented onto the E-W wall at ca. 1011.70 N and destroyed this wall in these places.  ; ; The earlier phase of fencing survives as a series of small, whitish gray cement foundations (B17).  The second phase of fencing survives as a series of noticeably larger concrete slabs spaced at regular intervals (B16).  We know this phase is later because the metal posts were still intact as a functional fence at the beginning of excavation.  It is possible that these two phases of fencing were built at the times of the two previous excavation campaigns in this area of the archaeological site, one in 1936 and one in 1961.; ; CONCLUSION; ; The first three weeks of excavation in Nezi field have produced a stratigraphic sequence and grouping of associated finds to indicate a solidly Modern and Early Modern date for the vast majority of our excavated contexts.  The possibly earlier contexts consist of the pit (B36, B37, B39, B41, B43, B46), the tile scatter, and the orange-clay feature.  We hope that further excavation will refine our chronology.  We will continue our notebook research on the previously excavated area north of Nezi field in order to understand better the relationship between that area and the stratigraphy of Nezi field, particularly in the area north of the E-W wall.  Based on the remains of an enclosure in the SW corner of the excavation area and the robbing trench with its associated wall projecting out of the north scarp, we are hopeful of fulfilling our goal of investigating Turkish, Frankish, and Byzantine remains and connecting them to previously excavated sections E and J.","Pre-Early Modern to Modern Strata in the Southern End of Nezi Field","Report","Corinth","","Corinth:Report:Nezi Field 2007 by Lydia Herring, Josh Langseth, Kris Lorenzo (2007-04-09 to 2007-04-27)","","","","","Nezi Field 2007 by Lydia Herring, Josh Langseth, Kris Lorenzo (2007-04-09 to 2007-04-27)","","Corinthia | Ancient Corinth | Central Area | Nezi Field",""
"EXCAVATION SUMMARY; ; Six weeks ago, on April 10, 2007, we, Lydia Herring, Josh Langseth, and Kris Lorenzo, opened an excavation area at the extreme north of the Nezi field under the supervision of Guy Sanders, James Herbst, and Alicia Carter.  Nezi field is an orchard south of the area excavated by H. Robinson in the 1960s, which is itself south of the South Stoa in the Forum.  We worked with a crew of workmen including Kleomenis Didaskalou (pickman), Billy Papanikolaou (pickman), Andreas Oikonomou (pickman), Vassilis Kollias (shovel/barrowman), Iannis Oikonomou (shovel/barrowman), Andreas Didaskalou (shovel/barrowman), Vangelis Kollias (shovel/barrowman), Sotiris Raftopoulos (shovel/barrowman), and Thanasis Notis, the foreman.; ; The original area of excavation covered ca. 160 m² between 263E to 279E and 1002N to 1008N (minimum) / 1013.85N (maximum).  The northern edge of the excavation area is an escarpment left by the excavations of 1936 and 1961, and thus irregular.  On Wednesday, April 18, 2007, we extended the excavation area in order to find the limit of an orange-clay and stone feature at the southern boundary of the excavation area.  The addition covers 266E to 271E and 1002N to 1001N, thus bringing the total excavation area to ca. 165 m².  ; ; Our objective was to investigate Turkish, Frankish, and Byzantine remains and connect them to what was excavated in the area called Agora SW section E (NB 227, 228, and 237) and Agora SW section J (NB 254, 262, 267, 294) in 1961, along with the exploratory trench dug by Amyx and Morgan in 1936 at the southern extreme of the Giambourani field (the field just north of the Nezi field).  This essay will describe the activity in our area in chronological order based upon our interpretation of the stratigraphy.; ; FRANKISH (1210-1458 CE); ; The earliest contexts in our excavation area are two walls whose top courses have just been uncovered.  The first, revealed with B65, B115, B117, B131, B137 (the fill of a possible robbing trench), and B139, runs north-south, and is preserved between 1003N and 1006N.  At its southern terminus, there are two flat squared blocks, each of which has a pivot hole, and have been tentatively identified as a threshold.  The closest date for the wall so far, based on the pottery date for the fill (B115) covering the wall, is the Frankish period.  The second wall, revealed with B129 and B138, also runs north-south, between 1003N and 1007N, but forms a corner with a wall running east-west between 268E and 269.80E.  The closest date for this wall so far is the date of a coin (2007-189) in the fill coving the wall (B129), issued by William Villehardouin between 1246 and 1267 CE.  The two walls appear to be parallel—their southern extents are only approximately 20 cm different—so we hypothesize that they are from the same structure.  It is possible that these walls may be earlier than the Frankish period, but only continuing excavation will determine their date of construction.; ; Above the second wall, the next activities in our excavation area are represented by a stone and clay feature (B26=B86, B88, B90, B123) which may be an oven or furnace, and an associated series of clay floors (B94, B99, B100, B102=B105=B106=B108, B110, B113=B118, B119, B120, B121, B122, B124) laid down over time in the third quarter of the 13th century CE and before the early 14th century CE.  This chronology is based on a reading of the pottery and coins in significant contexts that pre- and post-date the clay floors (B129, B86).  The hypothesis that the stone and clay feature is an oven is supported by the absence of bone inside it, the high percentage of cookware among the pottery recovered from the clay floors, its shape and construction, the burnt stones of the flooring (B90), and the ash outside the oven on one of the clay floors (B100=B102=B105=B106=B108).; ; Before the construction of either the oven or the floors, however, the ground was leveled to prepare the area (B125, B126, B129) in the late 13th century CE, sometime after 1246–1267; this date is based on pottery in a deposit underneath the leveling fill (B128) and the presence in the fill (B129) of a coin issued by William Villehardouin (2007-189).  The first layer of flooring (B122), which was well-preserved, was then laid and the wall of the oven (B123) built on a clay bedding (B124).  The wall is comprised of two lengths (E-W: 96 x 35 cm; N-S: 152 x 35 cm) that meet at a right angle.  Only one course of squared limestone blocks over a layer of tiles is preserved.  ; ; A poorly preserved second layer of clay floors (B110, B113=B118=B119, B120, B121) soon followed, prior to a third, again well-preserved, layer of floor (B100=B102=B105=B106=B108).  After the construction of this third phase of flooring, the area inside the oven was leveled (B89, B92, B93) for the oven’s floor which was constructed with stone packing and clay (B90), and several layers of clay were deposited in the oven (B26=B86, B88).  It is possible that the clay is one single thick deposit that eroded from the walls of the oven after it went of out of use.  We know that the floor of the oven was constructed after the third phase of flooring because the third phase is cut by the leveling for the floor of the oven.  Since the wall of the oven itself predates the third phase of clay floors – this third phase was built up around the wall - it is likely that there was also an earlier floor in the oven, most likely associated with the first phase of clay floor (B122).  The removal of the original flooring and clay in the oven may be related to a deposit of black ash over the third phase of clay floors (B100 et al.).; ; There is also a rubbish pit cut into this third phase of floors (cut = B76).  This pit is oval-shaped, with a maximum diameter of 1.20 m and minimum diameter of 0.90 m.  The density of inclusions, especially cookware and coarse pottery sherds, supports the suggestion that this is a rubbish pit.  The clay floor (B100=B102=B105=B106=B108) is also disturbed by a large stony pile of rubble (B77) that reinforces the interpretation that the oven and floors are situated in a space that is unenclosed by walls.  We found no evidence of either walls or robbing trenches around the clay floors.; ; The primary indicator of roofing over the area is a destruction collapse in the form of a concentrated scatter of roof tiles (B51=B58=B59) that do not extend beyond the rectilinear extent of the clay floors.  This tile scatter also contains worked marble fragments.  The deposit of scattered tiles contains pottery dating to ca. 1260-1280, but the collapse must date to the early 14th century CE because the tiles postdate the deposits in the clay oven, the latest of which contained a coin (2007-113) of Isabelle Villehardouin dating between 1297 and 1301 CE.; ; Other early 14th century CE Frankish activities are the creation of a possible irrigation canal and the robbing out of an earlier wall.  The possible irrigation canal, to the east of the oven and clay floors, takes the form of a roughly north-west/south-east trench (cut=B70) with two east-west subsidiary trenches.  All three trenches are linear, with parallel sides, and the main canal was filled with large amounts of pottery and intact bone after it went out of use.  The presence of an irrigation canal would suggest that the eastern portion of the excavation area is outdoor space and that the levels of fill in this area (B45, B47, B48, B60, B63, B66, B69, B84=B85, B98, B101, B104, B111) were for agricultural or horticultural purposes.  This is in contrast to the western half of the excavation area, where the architectural contexts are located (note: there is also dumping or leveling fill [agricultural?] in this western area: B56, B95, B103, B109, B115=B130, B116=B143, B135, B136, B139). ; ; The robbing trench (cut = B54) removed the top of a wall projecting from the northern scarp into the area excavated in 1961.  At the bottom of this trench are the remains of the wall constructed with stones and tiles, running roughly north-south.  The wall appears to bound a space demarcated by the roof tiles and floor surface visible—though as yet unexcavated—in the northern escarpment because the roof tiles end at the eastern face of the wall.; ; [Addendum 6/14/07: It is now believed that B129 and B131 in fact date to the Ottoman II period and thus some of the Frankish material discussed in this summary has been re-evaluated.  It is now thought that the oven and its associated floors all date to the Turkish period because of their stratigraphic relationship to B129. Some of the fills (B129 and B131) that covered the N-S walls mentioned at the beginning of the Frankish section of this summary also must be associated with Turkish activity in the area. For additional details, see the relevant baskets and the summary by Angela Ziskowski and Lina Kokkinou.]  ; ; ; OTTOMAN II (1715-1831 CE); ; We have uncovered a series of lenses of fill, and, based on the make-up of these contexts, some appear to be dumped, perhaps for leveling purposes (B28, B42, B53, B55, B65=B78=B80, B79, B87, B114).  A large pit or well cuts these deposits (B36, B37, B39, B41, B43, B46; 1008.08N to 1005.96N, and 268.40E to 266.40E).  This pit contained three lenses of fill with pottery dating to the second Ottoman period.  This pit also cuts the Frankish destruction debris discussed above.  We have temporarily ceased excavating this pit because it is 1.41 m deep and difficult for the workmen to climb in and out of; excavation will resume once the surrounding deposits have been excavated to a more manageable height.  The date of the construction of this pit (or well) is clear because it cuts deposits of the Ottoman II period (B65, B49), so the pit had to have been both dug and then mostly filled in during the Ottoman II period.; ; It is interesting to note that the Ottoman II deposits are located solely in the western and northern portions of the excavation area.  This perhaps suggests that they are all associated with a structure or structures outside the excavation area.; ; EARLY MODERN (1831-1949 CE); ; In the Early Modern period, a property boundary wall (B64, B67, B73), running roughly E-W, was constructed.  Within our excavation area, the wall is 16.28 m long, 0.57 m wide, and preserved to a maximum height of 0.55 m above ground.  Its maximum northing is 1011.70N, and its minimum northing is approx. 1009.20N, where it joins the northern scarp of the excavation area.  This wall continues past our excavation area both east and west, but is not preserved to the same height from 275.80 E to beyond the eastern edge of our excavation area, where it has collapsed (B72), thus revealing the north scarp to the eye.  It is constructed of field stones arranged in random courses with mud as a bonding agent.  This wall was presumably excavated in part by Amyx and Morgan in 1936 (NB 153, 154).   It cuts an Early Modern deposit (B40), and has a pottery date of the 19th – early 20th century CE. ; ; The Early Modern activity in the excavation area is agricultural in nature and consists primarily of two layers of plow zone.  The first, B2=B24, lies above a series of plow furrows (B22) in the southern portion of the excavation area and has an average depth of 0.5 m. ; ; At the bottom of the first layer of plow zone, plow furrows were defined which cut into the soil below (furrows = B22).  The furrows vary in length and width and run from the eastern extreme of the excavation area to the western extreme.  They first appear approximately one meter south of the E-W boundary wall.  The plow furrows cut into the walls and uppermost clay deposit of the Frankish oven.; ; The second layer of plowzone (B23=B27=B30=B33=B34=B50=B58=B62), into which the plow furrows were cut, has an average depth of 21 cm.  Perhaps the difference in depth between the first and second plowzones reflects a change in plowing technology.; ; The layers of soil (B14, B38, B44, B57, B61) below the second layer of plow zone (B23 et al.)—perhaps some form of ground leveling—also show signs of Early Modern human activity in the eastern half of the excavation area in the form of an ash pit (B44), probably from a fire.  The top of the pit (discussed above; cut = B71) to the west, which dates to the second Ottoman period, was topped of with one layer of fill (B36) in the Early Modern period, probably to correct for the settling in of the rest of the fill below).; ; Also associated with Early Modern agricultural activities is a linear pile of stones (B4).  This layer abuts the south face of the E-W boundary wall and is most likely a pile of field cobbles which farmers cleared from the field.  These cobbles predate the later phases of fencing (see below for B16, B17) between Nezi field and Giambourani field. ; ; MODERN (post-1950 CE); ; Along both sides of the E-W wall in the Modern period are several fill deposits.  The uppermost fill on the north side of the wall (B3) contains worked marble fragments that may be the result of dumping from the 1936 excavation, or also (in this case) from the later 1960’s excavations under Robinson in sections E and J, north of the Nezi field.  South of the E-W wall are two fill deposits (B5, B14) that may perhaps be the result of terracing for agricultural activity.  However, the uppermost fill (B5) also included marble fragments, some of which were worked.  Because similar fragments also occur in the fill north of the E-W wall (B3)—which, along with B5, also directly borders Amyx and Morgan’s 1936 excavation trench in what was later called section E—we hypothesize that this fill is most likely fill dumped by the 1936 excavators.  Worked marble fragments have been found at this level of elevation only in these two contexts in the area along the north scarp.; ; South of the E-W wall, in the Modern orchard, a series of tree pits and irrigation trenches were cut into the most recent plow zone (B2 = B24).  The irrigation trenches (B18 = B32, B19) comprise two linear cuts running north-south up to the south-west side of individual tree pits, but not joining it (B18 ran up to B7 (cut = B10), B19 ran up to B11 (cut = B15).  Each trench contained a black plastic irrigation hose.  The irrigation trenches continue south out of the excavation area, and probably are connected with other tree pits within the presently growing orange orchard south of the excavation area.  They also cut into the uppermost clay deposit and walls of the Frankish oven.; ; The five tree pits in the excavation area are arranged in three north-south rows, ca. five meters apart.  Each of the tree pits (B6 [cut = B9], B7 [cut = B10], B8 [cut = B12], B11 [cut = B15], B21 [cut = B25]) contained an orange tree and root system, all of which the workmen cleared; the workman, most of whom have extensive agricultural experience, estimate the age of the trees to be no more than forty years old.  Each pit cuts into the surface cut by plow furrows (furrows = B22) and the soil into which the furrows were cut (B23=B27=B30=B33=B34=B50).; ; Tree pit B6 (cut = B9) contained very dark black specially fertilized soil with small white polystyrene inclusions and small areas of yellowish white clay.  Both the specially fertilized soil and yellowish white clay would have been part of a mix of soil and other matter that surrounded the orange sapling when it was put in the pit. The clay and the polystyrene most likely functioned to retain moisture for the sapling.; ; The latest activity in our excavation area is the construction of two phases of cement foundations used to anchor a series of posts supporting chain-link fencing.  This fencing runs along the northern boundary of Nezi field.  Both phases of cement foundations were cemented in part onto the E-W wall (ca. 1011.70N).  Parts of the wall were removed to lay the cement foundations after the wall had gone out of use.; ; The first phase (B17) is a series of small, whitish gray cement foundations.  The second phase of fencing (B16) is comprised of a series of noticeably larger concrete slabs spaced at regular intervals.  We know this phase is later because the metal posts were still intact as a functional fence at the beginning of the 2007 excavation season.; ; CONCLUSION; ; The past six weeks of excavation in Nezi field have produced a stratigraphic sequence and grouping of associated finds to indicate four phases of activity—Modern, Early Modern, Ottoman II, and Frankish.; ; In the Frankish period, there is a distinction between indoor and outdoor space, as seen in the existence of built structures, including what we interpret as an oven, in the western half of the excavation area and agricultural activity in the eastern half.; ; In the Ottoman II period, there is leveling, perhaps for agricultural activity, and the creation of a possible pit or well.; ; In the Early Modern period, there is more agricultural activity (plowing) and the creation of a new division of property, at least since the Frankish period (the boundary wall at the north of Nezi field cuts through the middle of single Frankish deposits).; ; In the Modern period, there is a different type of agricultural activity—the planting of an orchard rather than plow zone—but also archaeological activity at the northern extreme of the excavation area.; ; There remain a number of questions that we hope will be addressed in future excavation:; ; --Are the squared blocks in the southern scarp, between 269E and 271E, part of a wall?  Are they associated with the structure enclosed by the two north-south walls currently being excavated?  ; ; --Does the large cut stone block revealed in the western scarp of the robbing trench (cut = B54) in the northern third of the excavation area indicate the presence of a wall running perpendicular to the wall at the bottom of the robbing trench (B54)?  ; ; --What is the Ottoman II pit (cut = B71) that we have not finished excavating, a pit or a well?; ; --The removal of several contexts (B40, B56, B116=B143, B135, B136) in the northern quarter of the excavation area has revealed a deposit of clay with a flat-bottomed linear depression and a flat surface cut by the Early Modern boundary wall’s construction trench (cut = B73).  Is this clay deposit indoor space or outdoor space?  Is the flat-bottomed linear depression the bedding for a wall similar to the clay oven’s (cf. B124)?; ; --Is the tile scatter revealed under B135 and B136—its northern edge was always visible in the north escarpment—a destruction horizon?  What is its full extent and relationship, if any, to the wall at the bottom of the northern robbing trench (cut=B54)?     ;   ; --Since we have begun to uncover several contexts that suggest the presence of interior space, in addition to numerous exterior contexts, what is the sequence of changes in outside vs. inside space in Nezi field?; ; And finally, one brief observation and a caveat.  Several baskets (B86, B105, B129) in closely-dated contexts within our excavation area have had their pottery dates raised significantly by coins found in the deposits—this is unusual for archaeology at Corinth.  And the caveat: a portion of a number of deposits—primarily the clay floors and their related contexts—was set aside for water sieving, which has not yet been performed.  The data provided may alter some of our pottery readings and interpretation of the activities associated with the floors.","Frankish to Modern Strata in the Southern End of Nezi Field","Report","Corinth","","Corinth:Report:Nezi Field 2007 by Lydia Herring, Josh Langseth, Kris Lorenzo (2007-04-09 to 2007-05-18)","","","","","Nezi Field 2007 by Lydia Herring, Josh Langseth, Kris Lorenzo (2007-04-09 to 2007-05-18)","","Corinthia | Ancient Corinth | Central Area | Nezi Field",""
"Charles George, Rossana Valente; Nezi Field Excavations; N: 1015.90 N, S: 1006.90 N, E: 264.20 E, W: 255.50 E; 28 May – 22 June, 2012; ; This is a final summary of the third season of excavation (28th May – 22th June) in 2012 in the northwest area of Nezi field. Guy Sanders (director) and Heather Graybehl (field director) supervised. The blue excavation team consisted of Charles George and Rossana Valente (recorders), Athanasios Sakellariou (pickman), Athanasios Notis (pickman), Christos Sakellariou (shovelman), and Pavlos Sennes (barrowman).; Excavation began in the area bounded by the Giambouranis house (NB 252, NB 262, 1015.90 N) to the north, Wall 540 to the east (264.20 E), Wall 366 to the south (1006.90 N), and the balk of Nezi field (255.50 E) to the west. The lack of preserved architecture, except the partially preserved Wall 747, led us initially to interpret our area as exterior space associated with the Byzantine room to the south, bounded by Wall 366 and Robbing Trench 497 to the north (1006.00 N), Wall 365 to the south (1002.10 N), Wall 332 to the east (262.07 E) and Wall 306 to the west (258.01 E). The goal of this session was to further explore the Byzantine habitation layers found during earlier excavations in the area (2008 and 2009, sessions 1st and 2nd 2012), with the hope of better understanding the use of space in this area during Frankish and Byzantine times and also of reaching Late Roman material by the end of the season.; ; Late Antique (5th-7th AD); ; We have reached Late Antique contexts in the northeast of the area which are overlaid by Wall 540, dated to the late 11th c. For this reason, we cannot see the eastern ends of the contexts, and we suggest close cooperation and contact with the Pink Team’s excavations of the area east of the wall.; We have identified a mid 6th- early 7th c. AD floor (S 936, removed as 957), which seems to continue under wall 540, and we argue that it is equal to a floor in the Pink Area (S941). This context contained two fifth century nummi (coin no.  2012-159, 160), with five fifth century nummi (coin no. 2012- 162-166, 169) also found in what we interpret as the continuation of the floor to the north (959), and two fifth century nummi (coin no. 2012-161, 164 ) found in a suggested floor surface below S 936 (958). The excavation of the floor has revealed another possible floor, which itself was laid over another possible floor surface. This may suggest that we have a stratification of floors indicating several successive habitations during the Late Antique period. The section of the floor called 959 seems to be laid on an E-W wall (S 918), therefore dating the wall earlier. It is unclear when and under what circumstances the wall later was robbed out. However, further excavation in the area and removal of wall 540 should elucidate the relationship. ; ; Above floor S 936 is a tile destruction layer (934), which is likely equal to the tile destruction layer across wall 540 on the Pink Team’s tile destruction layer 929. The elevation of Pink 929 is roughly equivalent to that of Blue 934 and part of Blue 931, a leveling fill directly above the destruction layer. As supporting evidence for this relationship is an AFRS form 99, which has joining fragments both in Blue 931 and Pink 929.; ; Vast quantities of sherds of Late Antique pottery have been found in the fill of a Late Byzantine lime pit (the eastern part of pit is 878 and western part is 917), an ovular Byzantine pit (888), and adjacent cleaning contexts and leveling fills (895, 906, 907, 908). Also, a Late Antique glass bottle (MF 2012-50) and jar (MF 2012-51) have been found in the lime pit (917). While we have interpreted these all as redepositions, the large size of the glass sherds and the size and density of the pottery suggest that the Late Antique material in these fills does not show signs of frequent redeposition.; ; Late Byzantine (1059-1210 AD); ; The most important feature identified as Late Byzantine is the western portion of wall called 747, which dates to the late 11th c. The excavation of the fill to the east of western wall 747 has revealed a finished surface to the wall and an apparent end to the foundation beneath the wall. We think that in this space East of Western wall 747 there was an entrance. As the Western and eastern portions of wall called 747 are on the same axis, despite the gap and differences in construction, we maintain that they are contemporaneous and of the same structure. We still hope to determine whether there was an interior space north or south of the wall. North of 747 may have been exterior as suggested by the massive pit there (C 870, fill 844 and 868, W-E 258.43-261.89, S-N 1011.63-1014.56), which we have identified as a bothros, since it contains a mix of pottery ranging from the Geometric Period to the late 11th c.; ; Western Wall 747 seems to be surrounded by several leveling fills that are also dated to the Late Byzantine period. These leveling fills are both north (854, 855, 857, 858, 859, 863, 868, 869, 875, 876, 925, and 927) and south (897 and 904) of Wall 747. These leveling fills characterized by a yellowish brown soil, are poorly sorted, and there are not many material inclusions. Small quantities of pottery are found across these contexts. These small contexts are overlaid in several areas by various lenses of leveling fill, often consisting of harder-packed and different colored soil, but the pottery dates from all of these contexts suggest that they are all part of a relatively contemporaneous leveling of the area. None of these contexts has a precise date for the Late Byzantine period; we can relate this context to the Late Byzantine leveling activity of this area mainly by stratigraphic relationships. In the middle Byzantine dumped fill of a robbing trench along the W Scarp (950), we have found a likely-Christian clay bread mold (MF 2012-47). These fills seem bounded by Wall 747 in the south but extend as far as the Northern Balk.; ; We have found a lime pit (C 882, W-E 257.54-260.87 S-N 1008.88-1010.10, filled by 878 and 917) directly south of Western Wall 747. All the preserved sides of this pit are covered with lime. It is possible that the walls of this cut were intentionally covered with lime, for building purposes. For example, the lime pit may have been used for the construction of walls 747 and/or 540, which both also seem to date to the late 11th c. In a later action, this cut was filled by a dumped fill (878 and 917). The filling of this cut, dated to the late 11th c, is a secondary deposition of large quantities of Late Antique pottery (5th – 6th C). Excavation of the oven (S 910) and the area between the oven and the pit will elucidate the issue and will provide confirmation as to the western boundary of the pit, which is not yet certain.; ; Last but not least in importance is pit 888 (W-E 262.21-263.10, N-S 1009.06-1007.06). Partially excavated during session 1 (888=680), this pit seems to be a bothros. Its dumped fill, dated to the 11th C, seems to be a secondary deposition of much earlier material including large quantities of Late Antique (5th – 6th C)  pottery, Late Antique coins (2012 22-29, 105-126), and a 2nd-3rd c. incised intaglio (MF 2012-33). ; ; Frankish (1210-1458 AD); ; During the Frankish period E - W Wall 747 was partially robbed out. As noted during session 2, certain fills (833, 744) excavated in the robbing trench for this wall were distinguished both in materials excavated and soil composition, and should be considered the first robbing episode of this structure. ; S of this robbing trench, we excavated a Frankish pit dated by the pottery to 1270 (C 926 filled by 883, 884, 885, 887, 889, W-E 261.88-264.03, S-N 1010.35-1008.90). The pit was particularly rich in finds, including luxurious items such as gilded bone bands (MF 2012-43, 45), incised bone knife handles (MF 2012-48), and gilded bronze flower-shaped clamps (MF 2012-53A, 53B, 54, 55) as well as stone- and metal- working tools such as a lead cupellation bowl (MF 2012-38) and an iron chisel (MF 2012-40). Also found was a pecten shell used by pilgrims travelling on the Way of St. James to Santiago de Compostela (MF 2012-34).; ; Below the pit, we came on the head of a well, a cistern, or a manhole (S 902 W-E 262.23-262.71, S-N 1009.55-1010.05). The structure is lined with plaster, and goes down 2.35 m, without any visible fill except for a small accumulation of debris, much of which is from our excavation of proximate contexts. The hole seems to have been intentionally closed with blocks. That it is a manhole is suggested by the slightly ovular shape of the hole, but it appears to be self-contained in all horizontal directions, which makes it more likely that it was a cistern or a well. That it is a well is suggested by the nearly intact water jug that was found at the bottom of pit 889, just centimeters away from the hole. Further excavation is needed to ; Another Frankish pit (C 871, filled by 860, W-E 255.51-256.95, S-N 1011.92-1013.63) was excavated during the second quarter of the 13th C, as its dumped fill suggests. This pit, located next to the W scarp of the excavation area has been interpreted as a bothros. Interestingly, the N side of the pit scarp is full of tile. A few large, unworked stones (possibly mined bedrock) are visible at the bottom on the E side. ; These pits may have been created for the purpose of storage. Generally Frankish pits were made along walls, as the surface of the wall offered an easy ready-made boundary for the pit. Our Frankish pits C 871 and C 926 correspond to this interpretation as do two Frankish pits excavated by the Pink Team (C 847, C 867).; ; Early Modern (1831-1945); ; Context 880 is the only context that has been dated to the Early Modern period, specifically Turkish II. We have interpreted the Turkish finds as contamination from the robbing trench for wall 747 (759), and therefore we interpret the context as a disturbance of the Frankish pit (C 926).; ; Recommendations; ; We recommend to future excavators the following:; ; 1.    Take down Wall 540. We are now certain that the Late Antique floors in the northeast of our area (S 936, 939, and those stratigraphically below) continue under the wall and into the Pink area (see above). The excavation and dating of the wall would remove an obstacle to excavating in the area and would be helpful for dating in the area. Lastly, there are many walls in the Blue (S 747 and S 918) and Pink areas that misalign by as few as 0.10-0.30 m, and the excavation of the wall would help in seeing more clearly whether they are related and how.; ; 2.    Excavate oven S 910 and the surrounding contexts in order to determine the relationship between the oven and the Byzantine lime pit to the east (C 882). ; ; 3.    Excavate floors S 911 and S 912 to discern their dates as well as the relationship between the two floors and between the floors and the surrounding area; ; 4.    Take down the contexts east of 949 and then proceed to finish its excavation. Digging in this area is important for understanding the boundary between the Late Antique material to the east and the 11th c. lenses of fill 844 to the west.; We hope that in the future, interior and exterior areas will be able to be identified, and that the Late Antique levels, now appearing in the NW, will become apparent throughout the area.","2012 Session 3 Team Blue Final Summary","Report","Corinth","","Corinth:Report:Nezi Field 2012 by George, Charles Valente, Rossana (2012-06-26 to 2012-06-27)","","","","","Nezi Field 2012 by George, Charles; Valente, Rossana (2012-06-26 to 2012-06-27)","","Corinthia | Ancient Corinth | Central Area | Nezi Field",""
"Katherine Harrington, Jana Mokrišová; Team Blue, Session 1; Nezi Field Excavations; N: 1017.20 N, S: 1006.90 N, E: 263.50 E, W: 255.50 E; 1-25 April, 2013; ; This is the final summary of the first session of excavation in 2013 in the northwest area of Nezi field. Guy Sanders (director) and Rossana Valente (field director) supervised. The blue excavation team consisted of Katherine Harrington and Jana Mokrišová (recorders), Athanasios Notis (foreman and pickman), Athanasios Sakellariou (pickman), Christos Sakellariou (barrowman), and Panayiotis Rontzokos (shovelman). ;     ; The excavation area was initially bounded by the Giambouranis House (also referred to as the Turkish house; NB 252, NB 262, 1015.90N) to the north, Wall 540 (264.20 E) to the east, Wall 366 (1006.90 N) to the south and the baulk of Nezi field (255.50 E) to the west. However, the northern boundary was extended in course of the excavation by the discovery of N-S drain to the northernmost point of the drain (1017.20 N), and after the removal of the wall 540 the eastern boundary was moved to 263.50 E.; ; The goal of this session was to remove final traces of Byzantine occupation in the excavation area and to further explore the Late Antique levels with the hopes of better understanding the Late Roman/ Late Antique occupational activities in the area. In addition, we also re-examined the sequence of Middle and Late Byzantine walls in the area. ; ; Late Antique (5th-7th century CE); ; We reached the Late Antique levels in most of the excavation area, except possibly any remaining fill in Cut 1040 (N-S 1016.46-1014.59, E-W 259.47-258.59), a robbing trench running N-S next to the eastern wall of the Turkish house, which may continue deeper. Additionally, we believe that there might be an extension of this robbing trench on the south side of Cut 870 in an area that was not investigated during this session (under Context 927). ; ; An ovoid hearth, with a schist and tile bottom, was revealed in the southeastern part of the excavation area (N-S 1012.49-1011.56, E-W 262.46-261.57), but was subsequently excavated by Mohammed Bhatti and Daniel Diffendale. The fill within the hearth contained a single illegible coin (no. 2013-144), a possible minimus dated to the 5th-6th century CE, and Late Roman coarse wares. ; ; The most significant Late Roman activity in the excavation area is the series of tile destruction fills dumped in the western side of the excavation area (immediately west of Cut 870). The earliest and the largest fill, Deposit 1080 (N-S 1015.83-1011.22, E-W 258.48-255.73), yielded a large amount of broken tile, charcoal, as well as over 200 kg of pottery and a significant amount of glass, metal, and animal bone. This is clearly a dump consisting of a large amount of cooking wares, storage vessels (e.g. amphorae), as well as glass tableware, which seems to be an assemblage of a wealthy household or households. Special objects include three bone plaques with incised concentric circles, possibly belonging to a single wooden box (MF-2013-6a-c), an iron buckle (MF-2013-4), a bronze tack (MF-2013-5), and several rare forms of African Red Slip Ware (C-2013-3, C-2013-4). Most of the 56 coins found in this layer were illegible. Some coins, however, provide a useful terminus post quem for the dating of this layer. One such coin, 2013-128, might date to after the 491 CE reform of Anastasius due to the possible presence of denomination mark. Similarly, Coin 2013-139 may also bear a denomination mark. However, the identification of these coins is tentative due to their poor preservation and will need to be verified by Orestes Zevros.  Several other 5th century CE coins (nos. 2013-91, 2013-96, 2013-113) and an interesting possibly counterfeit coin of “barbaric style” dating to 383-402 CE (no. 2013-123) were also found in the context. Ceramic evidence was more useful in dating this context. Most of the pottery from dates to late 5th century CE. However, the context has very few early 5th century sherds, and the lamps and African Red Slip forms present in the context suggest a slightly later date of 500-525 CE. ; ; Above the tile fill in the southern part of this area, two parallel curvilinear walls (S1068 and S1069), 0.45 m apart, rested on a deposit containing much dissolved mudbrick (Context 1073; N-S 1013.60-1011.79, E-W 257.53-255.71). The inner Wall 1068 was made of two courses of limestone cobbles (with the second course represented by only one stone) and a reused marble fragment (A-2013-1), while the outer Wall 1069 had only one preserved course. One section of both walls was covered with a localized concentration of mudbrick, clay, and stone (Context 1047). We originally identified this concentration as a structure, but later we concluded that it was probably a dump of building material or a dense filling between the two walls. The walls run into the western scarp, and unfortunately not enough was preserved to determine their function.   ; ; Above the northern side of the large destruction Context1080, there was another dense fill, Context 1058 (N-S 1015.65-1013.46, E-W 258.47-255.65), which was relatively tile-free, but contained a large amount of coarse and cooking pottery, many of which had joins. While this is not as clearly a destruction level since it did not contain much tile or other building material, there is no clear use-surface above or below it, and the presence of large pieces of charcoal and the joins in the pottery suggests that this may also have been a dumped destruction fill. Some rare pottery types and lamps from this context were saved, including a lamp from the workshop of Chionis (L-2013-1) dated to the late 5th/early 6th century CE, which seems to correspond well with the date based on the remaining pottery. ; ; The fill of Context 1046 (N-S 1015.80-1013.35, E-W 255.60-257.91), yet another layer rich in tile, ceramic, and bone, was smaller in extent and thinner than Context1080, but it included a similar range of materials. The pottery forms seem to be later and are dated to the second half 6th century CE. Similarly, the glass from this deposit contained a number of tubular ring goblet feet, which were introduced in the second half of the 5th century CE and were made with new technology. These were absent from Deposit 1080, which contained only vertical stemmed goblet feet. Thus, here we have two different types of technology represented in two separate deposits. According to Athenian Agora XXXIV, however, the two types may slightly overlap chronologically. Therefore, these two deposits may either represent two chronologically separate events, or may reflect the presence of two separate, but contemporary, households who both dumped material in the same area. Significant other finds include a large ovoid marble fragment, which may be a finial or part of a balustrade. ; ; The interpretation of the nature of the activities in this area is made difficult by the presence of large pit Cut 870 in the middle of the excavation area as well as the presence of the Turkish house to the north and the western baulk of the excavation area, all of which truncated the dumped fills. Given that the pottery dates for each of the three layers described above, it is difficult to determine whether these dumps are related to a single destructive event in the wider neighborhood or represent a series of independent events. One possibility may be that this area lay behind a N-S wall which once filled Cut 1040, which we believe to be a robbing trench. Thus, this may have been a convenient exterior dumping ground used over time. Another possibility may be that a large destructive event, such as the earthquake of 522, afflicted the area causing several households to dump their debris in one single area as a part of a general clean-up project. However, at this point we are reluctant to connect these deposits to a single historical event without further study of the pottery from these levels. Above these dumped fills were a series of leveling fills, which may have been laid down in order to reuse the area for new purposes at the end of the Late Roman period. ; ; The remaining Late Roman activity was located in the northwestern part of the excavation area. A well preserved section of a drain, Structure 1026 (N-S 1017.17- 1014.96, E-W 260.14- 259.75), ran N-S at the northern edge of the excavation area and was parallel to the robbing trench 1040. It appears to have been truncated by the building of Wall 918. The drain dates before the middle of the 6th century CE, based on stratigraphy, but since the structure itself and the fill it rests upon were not yet excavated, this date remains preliminary. The drain may have been connected to the well—excavated in the 1960s—located just north of it, immediately to the east of the Turkish house and may have been part of the drainage system of structure related to the wall we theorize filled Cut 1040. ; ; The latest Late Antique activity in the area is present in thin deposits preserved below Wall 540 on the east side of the excavation area. The wall, which dates to the early 12th century, was left pedestalled during the 2012 season (top H. 86.56m, bottom H. 85.98m). Excavation continued on both sides of the wall, and after its removal we were able to correlate this season’s deposits to some of those excavated in 2012. ; ; The pedestal below Wall 540 was preserved in three sections, interrupted by two robbing trenches, Cut 980 and Deposit 985. We excavated the two northern sections and Daniel Diffendale and Mohammed Bhatti excavated the southern section. Each of the two northern sections of the baulk below the wall contained two tile destruction levels, separated by a layer of leveling fill. This clear sequence allowed us to find equivalent layers of the baulk across the robbing trench of Wall 918/992 (filled by Contexts 975 and 985), which separated our two sections of the baulk. ; ; The lowest layers of the pedestal were excavated as Deposits 990 and 991 (990 N-S 1016.20-1014.64, E-W264.68-263.66; 991: N-S 1014.62-1011.63, E-W 264.59-263.76) and correspond to Structure 936 (dated to mid 6th- early 7th century CE), a compact floor surface excavated in 2012. They also relate to Deposit 1035, excavated by Bhatti and Diffendale. Given the narrowness of the pedestal, we cannot add much to the interpretation of this surface at this point. The possibility of further succession of floors below this level was suggested by George and Valente in 2012 report, but was explored by Bhatti and Diffendale during this season. ; ; The earliest tile destruction layer, Contexts 989 and 984, are equal to Contexts 934 and 929 excavated in 2012, due to their roughly equivalent elevations and presence of tile. This allows us to confirm that this tile destruction layer ran under the wall, as theorized by Valente and George in 2012. Our tile layer must have been part of a larger dump of tile, possibly resulting from the clean-up of a destroyed building elsewhere, or—as theorized in 2012—from the collapse of a roof. We were not able to equate the other layers of the pedestal (including the later tile layer) to levels excavated in the previous season, unfortunately. This may be due to a disturbance from the foundation trench of the wall or other activity in the area after the Wall 540 was built, which preserved the later tile layer under the wall, but removed it to the east and west. The layer intervening between the two tile dumps and the later tile dump itself date to the late 6th/early 7th century CE, while the top-most level of the baulk (Contexts 974 and 986) dates to the 7th century CE. ; ; ; Middle to Late Byzantine (802-1210 CE); ; During the mid-10th to late 11th centuries CE, there was a very large pit in the middle of the excavation area (Cut 870, N-S 1014.56-1011.63, E-W 261.89-258.43), which was previously identified as a bothros by George and Valente in 2012. This pit seems to have been filled over a period of time, with the cut and first preserved fill (Context 1002) dated to the late 10th-early 11th centuries and the latest fill (Context 844, excavated in 2012) dated to the late 11th century. This extremely large and deep cut may have functioned as a disposal bothros during this period. The bothros seems to have been filled by the time that the Late Byzantine walls in the area were built, so we are currently unable to associate it with any architecture. However, it must have existed in an exterior space at its time of use.; ; There seems to have been a flurry of building activity in this area during the late 11th and early 12th centuries. Wall 747/1087 seems to have been erected first, in the late 11th-early 12th centuries (1087: N-S 1010.81-101.11 E-W 258.29-255.75; 747: N-S 1010.80-1010.40, E-W 264.15-263.30).  During the 2012 season, the foundation trench (Cut 809) for Wall 1087 was partially excavated, but we removed the final layer of fill within the cut during this season, as Context 1086 (N-S 1011.38-1010.62, E-W 258.24-255.68), and we also exposed further foundations of the wall during cleaning. We are uncertain what space was defined by this wall in its earliest phase, but during a later phase in the early 12th century, it appears to have been abutted by the slightly later N-S Wall 540. Therefore, it seems that the space to the west of Wall 540 was divided into a northern and a southern section by Wall 747/1087. However, we cannot be certain whether these spaces were interior or exterior and we do not yet have evidence of any further walls defining the space.; ; Wall 540 (N-S 1015.20-1007.26, E-W 264.76-263.68), which consisted of two faces of roughly worked small boulders with cobbles and rubble in the interior, was removed during this season, allowing us to clarify its relationship with several other walls in the area. We are now certain that two E-W walls in the area, Wall 918/992  (N-S 1015.10-1014.57, E-W 266.12-259.56) and Wall 945 (N-S 1011.69-1010.89, E-W 264.50-260.95), were out of use by the time that Wall 540 was built, because Wall 540 was constructed over the robbing trenches of each of these walls. Perhaps these walls were removed in preparation for the building of Wall 540 or as part of a larger rebuilding project in the area. ; ; Recommendations for the future:; 1.    Excavate any remaining fill in Cut 1040 and investigate the possibility that this robbing trench continued on the south side of Cut 870. This would shed light on our theory that the wall which once filled this cut was related to the dumping ground to its west. ; 2.    Continue investigating the area bounded by Walls 992 and 945 to the east of Cut 870 in order to continue exploring the Late Roman levels. Special attention should be paid to any evidence of dumped destruction fills. ; 3.    Remove Drain 1026 and the fill below it to clarify the date of the drain. ; 4.    Consider excavating part of Wall 747/1087 for chronological purposes. ; 5.    Clean the bottom of Cut 870 to better understand the material exposed at its bottom and take closing levels, which we were unable to do during this session.","2013 Session 1, TeamBlue, Final Summary","Report","Corinth","","Corinth:Report:Nezi Field 2013 by Katherine Harrington, Jana Mokrišová (2013-05-09 to 2007-05-24)","","","","","Nezi Field 2013 by Katherine Harrington, Jana Mokrišová (2013-05-09 to 2007-05-24)","","Corinthia | Ancient Corinth | Central Area | Nezi Field",""
"Introduction: ; ; This is the finalreport of the second and third sessions for the excavation of the interior of the church in Unit 2 of the Frankish Quarter of the Temple E, southeast area. Guy Sanders (Director) and Danielle Smotherman (Field Director) supervised. Kaitlyn Stiles was the area supervisor and contributed as pickwoman when possible alongside AngelikiStamati (shovel and sieve), Sula Anastasopoulou (shovel and sieve) and KostasArberores (pickman).; ; The excavation area was bounded in the north by the north wall of the church (Wall 20, 1075.11 – 1074.52 N, 129.51-122.06 E), to the east by the east wall of church comprised of three sections, including two straight sections and an apse (North section: Wall 925, 1075.65-1073.90 N, 130.40-129.75 E; Apse: Wall 926, 1073.95-1070.7N, 131.70-129.70; South section: Wall 927, 1070.30-1068.95N, 131.05-120.5E), to the south by the south wall of the church (Wall 929, 1069.00-1067.6 N, 131.15-123.25E), and to the west by the west wall of the church (Wall 21, 1074.44-1067.99 N, 123.52-121.98 E) and the later threshold (Structure 22, 1072.09-1070.55 N, 123.31-122.25 W) built into Wall 21. ; ; The nave of the church was previously excavated in 1990 (NB 831, 835) down to a cement subfloor. The 2014 field season continued excavation in the NW quadrant of the church during which time portions of the narthex and nave were recorded down to the Frankish period (A.D. 1210-1458) revealing the bench-like structure (302) aligned with Wall 21 north of the later threshold (Structure 22), which was dated to the early 14th century. The excavations also recovered a large amount of human skeletal material which was common in the fills used in the late 13th and early 14th century phases of the church. Excavation was not continued within the church in the 2015 season, but was concentrated in Corridor North and Rooms 3, 6 – 9 in Unit 2. ; ; The 2016 Sessions II and III field work resumed the excavation of the interior of the church,primarily focusing on the eastern two-thirds covering the north and south aisles, the nave, and the transept. The subfloor revealed by the 1990 season and excavated in the NW quadrant of the church was completely removed from the nave, the transept, and the SE corner of the church. In Session IIwe worked toward understanding relationships of the surface under the cement floor with joining areas containing overlapping fill deposits and grave cuts throughout the entire interior of the church. Numerous fill deposits associated with various stages of flooring and floor repair, a threshold structure (Structure 924), and six graves (2016-01, 2016-02, 2016-03, 2016-04, 2016-05, 2016-06) were excavated during Session II. In Session III, we continued excavation in the church, but focused primarily on the south aisle. Mostly burials were excavated including three large graves (2016-07, 2016-08, 2016-09), which each contained a complicated series of burials.; ; The overarching purpose for excavating the church area at this time was to bring down the level of the interior church to a period consistent with the rest of the Frankish area so that it can be preserved and opened to the public. Because the church was used as a burial ground throughout many phases, one of the main goals of these sessions was to understand the chronological sequence of burials in relation to the use of the church as well as record information pertaining to grave usage and burial practices. ; ; Frankish Period (1210-1458); ; Grave 2016-09; ; Grave 2016-09 (Cut 1023, 1068.95-1068.40 N, 126.60-124.05E, filled by Deposits 1020 and 1024, Structure 1016, and Skeleton Contexts 1022, 1025, and 1027) is located in the southwest quadrant of the church, parallel to Grave 1990-40 on its south side, and truncated by Grave 2016-08 on its east side. This grave was discovered during the course of excavating Grave 2016-08 in which the eastern portion of the tile covering (Structure 1016) within Grave 2016-09 was found. Grave 2016-09 contained the remains of at least 3 individuals represented by one primary inhumation (Context 1025), and a jumble of bones (Context 1027). This grave evidently cuts an as yet unexcavated grave directly to the north as a cranium (Context 1022) was found essentially within the cut (1023) for the grave, indicating the burial of another individual beneath or beside it. The primary inhumation (1025) of Grave 2016-09 was enclosed by a covering (Structure 1016, L 1.69 x W 0.52 x D 0.11) made of ceramic and marble tiles, which also lined the north side of the grave. The original burial and burials prior to the inhumation of Skeleton 1025 are represented by the bone jumble (Context 1027) exposed beneath and to the south side of Skeleton 1025. These remains were stacked on the south side of the jumble and beneath the lower limbs of the inhumation. Very few bones were found directly on top of the primary inhumation (Skeleton 1025), including both in the fills above (Context 1020) and below (Context 1024) the covering (1016). One disarticulated infant femur was found under the covering, but on top of the inhumation. This bone indicates that the grave may have also been used for infant burials in addition to adult burials.; ; The primary inhumation (1025) was that of an elderly woman, oriented W-E, laid supine with her head elevated facing east and turned slightly to the south. The head was framed by a worked stone to the north and tiles to the west and south. The mandible was likely supported by a rock, which later fell out of place and came to rest on the sternum. The shoulders were elevated and the humeri drawn in so that they rested directly against the anterior-lateral aspects of the rib cage. The forearms were bent at the elbow and crossed over the chest with the left forearm over the right. The legs were straight but positioned so that the knees and ankles were almost touching. The femora were rotated medially toward one another. The arrangement of the arms and legs suggests that this woman was tightly wrapped in something like a shroud at the time of burial. The shroud may have caused her spinal column to contract in the burial as there was a noticeable curve in the spine to the north in the thoracic vertebrae around T6. An examination of the bones will provide more information about whether this was a result of positioning or reflected the spinal column in life. The left hand was found disarticulated around the midshaft of the right humerus, which suggests that the hand was held against the body when the shroud was still in place, but likely fell apart as the body decomposed. The shroud likely also prevented bones from the jumble from becoming interspersed within the inhumation.; ; The date of the most recent use of Grave 2016-09 is in the late 13th century or later based on the pottery from the fills both above (1020) and below (1024) the tile covering (1016). Finds from this burial included an iron ring (MF-2016-62) found still around a proximal phalanx of the left hand, which was wedged against the north side of the grave. There was one small piece of lapis lacedaimoniusthat may have come from a floor disturbed in the process of burial, possibly that represented by a subfloor (Context 1029) apparent along the south wall of the church (Wall 929). The single coin (Coin 2016-170) from the grave dates from 1143 to 1180 AD. A six-pointed iron spur or decorative star was found in the fill (Context 1020) above the cover tile (Context 1016), which may have been from a previous burial and was re-deposited in the fill for subsequent burials.The grave is cut by Grave 2016-08 (Cut 1009), which dates to the 15th century or later.; ; Grave 2016-03; ; Grave 2016-03 (Cuts 144 and 146, 1074.85-1074.05 N, 127.5-125.5 E) lies south of Wall 20, in the middle of the north aisle. It was parallel to Grave 2016-02on its north side and nearly forms a 90-degree angle to the east with Grave 2014-06. This grave was both a cist and a pit grave used for multiple interments, which were split into two distinct use phases. Phase I, represented by Cut 944, was cut by Phase II, represented by Cut 946. Both phases of burials are oriented W-E and are inline or within a stone lining (Structure 950). However, the stone lining (Structure 950) was disturbed during or prior to the burial of the primary inhumation (Skeleton 961) of Phase I. Structure 950 (L 0.82 x W 0.66 x D 0.24)is represented by one rectangular stone block on the north side and two rectangular stone blocks with a medium cobble between them on the south side. The stones run parallel to one another about 0.41m apart.; ; The Phase I burials are located on the west side of the grave(1074.85-1073.80 N, 126.20-125.05). They are represented by loose bones found in the fills (Contexts 958, 969, and 962), one distinct bone pile (Context 959), and one primary inhumation (Skeleton 961). The skeletal material in the fill contexts and bone pile are the remains of individuals buried in the grave prior to the burial of the articulated primary inhumation. The bone pile (Context 959) consisted of long bones placed over and to the side of a mostly intact cranium, which were all located on the south side of the burial. A small part of the cranium was under the tile covering (Structure 960) of the primary inhumation, but the height of the other bones in the pile above the tile covering indicate that the cranium may not have been intentionally placed under the tile but settled there over time. The loose bone in the fills located above (Contexts 958, 969) and below (Context 962) reinforce the picture of multiple burial as previous burials were cleared and then later placed on top of the primary burial or included with the fill of the burial.; ; The primary inhumation (961) represents the last burial before the location of the Phase I burials in the grave was forgotten. This inhumation was truncated by Grave 2014-06 (Cut 137) on the south side and by the Phase II burial activity (Cut 946) on the east side. The skeleton was essentially divided in half with the upper half of the skeleton preserved from the ribs to the cranium in the west end of Grave 2016-03. This portion of the skeleton was mostly articulated and in situ. The individual was covered by a concave ceramic tile (Structure 960), which was damaged by the truncation of Phase II burials and later by Grave 2014-06.Many tile fragments were found lying directly east of the tile covering within Cut 946 and were used to cover the head of the primary inhumation (Skeleton 956) of Phase II. The individual (Skeleton 961) was laid in a supine position with the arms drawn tightly toward the sternum and the elbows bent at acute angles placing the left hand close to the right side of the head and the right hand close to the left armpit. The articulated right hand was exposed with the fingers curled and one phalanx bearing an iron ring (MF-2016-32) in the excavation of the fill to the north (right) of the inhumation (Context 969). Another iron ring (MF-2016-31) was found over the left shoulder in the course of excavation. The position of the arms, shoulders, and hands indicates that the shoulders were constricted by something like a shroud, a coffin, or the pit prepared for the inhumation. The head was elevated and a medium size rock was located on its left side. There may have been a stone on the other side of the head but was excavated from truncating Grave 2014-06. This would have acted as the other “cheek piece” to hold the head in place. There was a larger rock and a large tile fragment laying on the lower half of the right rib cage. Upon removal of the rock, it was evident that the right ribs were disturbed. The sternal body had also been disarticulated to the south (right) side of the body and rotated so that it was oriented in the opposite direction (E-W instead of W-E). Disarticulated remains of other burials including a skull fragment, an extra right radius, and vertebrae were laid on the lower right ribs under the rock. Because this inhumation was truncated on the south side by Grave 2014-06, it is likely that some of the remains from this section of Grave 2016-03 were included in the fill of Grave 2014-06.; ; The fills (Contexts 958, 962, 969) of the Phase I burial have been dated by pottery and stratigraphy to the 14th century. They did not contain any grave goods other than the two iron rings (MF-2016-31, MF-2016-32) which date to the first half of the 11th century based on comparanda in Corinth 12 (Davidson 1952). Other small finds included one piece of coral, glass vessel fragments, and one iron nail.; ; The Phase II burials were designated by Cut 946 which truncated the Phase I burials. This burial phase involved at leastsix burials including one primary inhumation (Contexts 943, 945, 952, and 956). As with Phase I, many disarticulated bones were found in the fill (Context 943) and there was a distinct bone pile (Context 945). There was also a layer of bones (Context 952) laid on the legs and lower torso of the primary inhumation (956). The layer and other miscellaneous bones found in Fill 943 contained elements from every part of the body suggesting that the individuals represented by them occupied the tomb prior to the primary inhumation (Skeleton 956). They would have beenexhumed to provide spacefor the new primary burial and re-deposited with or, likely, before the soil was replaced. It is not possible at this time to determine which bones belonged to the originally inhumed individual as the Skeletal Layer (952) consists of at least four individuals including three adults and one juvenile based on the presence of three right adult femora and one unfused juvenile tibia. ; ; The bone layer (Context 952) was overlaid by another bone pile (Context 945),which was located in the upper levels of the fill (Context 943). It is difficult to say when this bone pile (Skeleton 945) was deposited relative to the skeletal layer (Context 952) as the soil of fill 943 was fairly consistent throughout the deposit (dark, reddish brown with frequent red clay lumps). However, the bone pile (Context 945) was located on top of the most eastern stone of Structure 950 and seemed to be lying directly upon Cut 946. Cut 946 was likely started at the same place as Cut 944, but once the diggers hit the stone lining (Structure 950), they angled the cut inward. It is unclear why the bone pile (Context 945) would have been placed higher in the fill on top of one of the cist stones.It may be due to how the grave was filled in after the placement of the primary inhumation (Skeleton 956).; ; The primary inhumation (Skeleton 956) consists of a probable male adult, age at death to be determined, who was laid in the grave in asupine position,oriented W-E with arms crossed over thechest at the lower sternum, right arm over left, with the right hand moderately curled. The shoulders were drawn in toward the spinal column, the elbows were elevated, and the head was raised and framed by broken tiles on either side of the face, over the face, and on top of the head.The constricted position of the shoulders suggests that this individual may have been buried in a shroud, though less tightly wrapped than Skeleton 961.The broken tiles are similar to the tile covering (Structure 960) over the inhumation of Phase I; thus, it is probable that these tiles were broken in the course of creating the Phase II burials and reused as a head covering in this case. A rock was removed from beneath the mandible, but it is unclear whether it was used to prop the head up from the chest. The legs were straight, and the right foot was laid out on the plantar surface, but the left foot had fallen to the left side (north) slightly. It is apparent that the cist tomb (Structure 950) was not originally built for this individual since the right upper arm is positioned where the next stone block of the cist tomb would have been located on the northwest side of the tomb. Thus, part of the stone lining of the cist was either removed for this burial or had been removed prior for another inhumation. This was supported by the Phase I burials lacking any cist stone lining on the west side of the grave.; ; Fill 943 contained pottery, many glass vessel fragments, coins, and a number of iron nails (4 complete, 17 fragments).The pottery has been dated to the 14th century, which is consistent with the overlying strata (Contexts 923, 915, and 914) which also date to the Frankish period. Three coins were discovered in the sieve (Coins 2016-138, 2016-139, and 2016-142). Coin 2016-139 dates to the Roman Imperial period and was minted between AD 341-346 under Constantius II. Coin 2016-142 is also from the Roman Imperial period, dating to the 4th century. Coin 2016-138 is of W. Villehardouin (1246-1278 A.D.), whichcorroborates Frankish dates provided by the pottery. The iron nails may indicate the presence of a coffin in one or more of the burial events of Phase II.One silver-plated bronze earring (MF-2016-27) was found in fill 943, which looks almost identical to an earring (MF-2016-28) found in fill 923 directly above Grave 2016-03.; ; Grave 2016-06; ; Grave 2016-06 (Cut 978, 1074.10-1073.50 N, 124.95-124.05 E, filled by Context 976, Structure 979, Skeleton Contexts 977 and 981) was a pit grave andwas positioned in line with Grave 2016-03 to the west and parallel with NW Pier Base (Structure 23).It appears to have been created after Grave 2016-03 based on its placement rather close to the west extent of Grave 2016-03. Like Grave 2016-03, Grave 2016-06 was also cut by Grave 2014-06, making it earlier than 2014-06, but later than Grave 2016-03. The grave contained two individuals, both infants. The original burial (Skeleton 977) was oriented W-E, with the cranium in the west end, supported by two small rocks on either side of the head. Only the cranium, the left scapula, right fibula, and potentially left foot phalanges were still in situ beneath the later inhumation (Skeleton 981). These elements indicate a supine body position. The remaining elements were disarticulated and primarily placed on the sides of the grave, with the majority being on the south side. The primary inhumation (Skeleton 981) was fully articulated and supine. The head was elevated,slightly turned to the north, and supported on the north side by a medium sized rock and on the south side by a large tile fragment. The apex of the crown was covered by a stone tile (Structure 979, L 0.27 x W 0.145 x D 0.05). The arms were bent at the elbow and crossed over the chest, right over left, directly below the sternum. The legs were laid out straight with the left foot flexed resting against the east wall of the cut. The age of the primary inhumation (Skeleton 981) is around 1 year of age based on in situmaximum femoral length. The originally buried individual (Skeleton 977) is a little older, possibly 18 months to 2 years old, based on comparative fibula lengths.; ; The fill of Grave 2016-06 contained only pottery and one small glass fragment. The pottery (2 sgraffito IV fragments) dates the grave to the 14th century, which is consistent with the relative chronology of Graves 2014-06 and 2016-03. The excavation of the bottom of the grave revealed a stone block very similar to those making up the cist lining of Grave 2016-03 (Structure 250). The block is in line with the south side of the cist lining and may be associated with it.; ; Grave 2016-04; ; Grave 2016-04 (Cut 965, 1073.50-1073.15 N, 126.85-126.10 E, filled by Context 963 and Skeleton 964) wasan oval pit grave placed in the central area of the nave to the south of Grave 2016-03 and to the east of Grave 2014-06, oriented W-E. The grave contained a single primary inhumation of an infant, around 1-year-old based on estimated maximum femoral length. The skeleton was supine, the head was elevated, and the arms were crossed over the chest, right over left, just below the sternum. The bones were in poor condition and the cranium fairly fragmentary. The grave cuts into an as yet unexcavated fill level. However, it lies beneath the concrete subfloor (Context 909) and its leveling fill (Context 918), which date to the 14th century. The pottery from the burial provides an 11th century date. However, based on its stratigraphy and the similar top elevation of Grave 2014-06, this burial likely dates to the Frankish period. The fill (963) contained a few glass vessel fragments, iron nails, and an iron needle. There were not enough iron nails to suggest a coffin, so it is possible these nails were brought in with soil from elsewhere.; ; Grave 2016-02; ; Grave 2016-02 (Cut 933, 1074.90-1074.65 N, 127.2-126.85 E, filled by Context 932) was cut into a surface abutting the robbing trenchon top of Wall 20. Only a quarter of the burial remained intact with the spine of the skeleton (Skeleton 934) protruding from the scarp wall. The proximity of the cut and burial to Wall 20 suggests that the wall may have served as the northern boundary of the burial pit. The cut (Context 933) of the burial suggests an oval shape, but it was truncated on the north and east sides by the robbing trench over Wall 20. The presence of human perinatal bones in Fill 932 also suggests that the grave may have been used for more than one interment. ; ; If the grave was used for more than one interment, the original burial was for a younger juvenile, likely perinatal (less than 1-year-old) based on the size of rib fragments and a scapula. The primary burial excavated from the grave consisted of the upper right side of the body. The cranium and most of the cervical vertebrae were missing as were all the lumbar vertebrae and at least a quarter of the thoracic vertebrae. The individual was placed in a supine position-oriented W-E with the right arm bent at the elbow over what would have been the pelvic region. The elbow was elevated due to its resting on a stone which was part of the stone lined cist Grave 2016-03 directly south of this burial. The upper ribs had collapsed on top of the lower ribs. Based on the size of the bones and epiphyseal fusion pattern, this individual was a child at the age of death (2-3 years old, based on estimated maximum length of the right humerus).; ; Kennedy and Cundy(2014) identified this grave while cleaning the south scarp of the robbing trench (Context 524) and suggested that it might be associated with a silver gilded bronze pendant (MF-2014-56) collected during this cleaning. None of the material culture collected during the excavation of the burial could confirm this suggestion. The fill (Context 932) containing the skeleton included very little pottery, a few small pieces of glass, a moderate amount of charcoal, and large chunks of hard, whiteish inclusions similar to the material from the cement subfloor cleared as Deposit 909. This presence of cement chunks suggests that the cut of the burial went through the cement subfloor. The cement subfloor (47)from the previously excavated portion of the nave was dated to the 14th century, which indicates that Grave 2016-02 may also date to the 14th century or later.; ; Disturbed Grave 2016-01; ; Grave 2016-01 (Cut 916, 1074.90-1074.2 N, 127.10.-126.30 E) was located directly on top of Grave 2016-03 next to Wall 20. It was extremely truncated by a leveling fill layer (Deposit 914). Cut 916 was quite shallow and contained the scattered remains of at least one adult and one juvenile, designated Skeleton 917. An unfused occipital was laid with the foramen magnum oriented up against the SE corner of the cut. The shape of the cut appeared to be oval, but it may have been more rectangular and extended toward Wall 20. The small size of the cut, even if it extended to Wall 20 indicates the grave was dug for a juvenile individual. The overlying fill (Context 914) contained a notable amount of human bone material, including unfused juvenile osacoxae, which was widely dispersed and not gathered in piles or a uniform layer as in Graves 2016-03, 2016-05, and 2016-06. This suggests that leveling activities that resulted in the fill of Context 914 destroyed most of Grave 2016-01, which also destroyed the primary inhumation. The skeletal material was then mixed with the dirt used for the fill level. The fill (Context 915) of Grave 2016-01 contained pottery dating to the 14th century. The pottery and Coin 2016-132 found in the fill above (Context 914) date to the late 13th or 14th century. It is much higher than Graves 2016-07 and 2016-08, but was disturbed by the implementation of the Cosmati-style floor (likely 15th c.) Therefore, the date of Grave 2016-01 is likely in the 14th century.; ; 15th Century ; ; Grave 2016-08; ; Grave 2016-08 (Cut 1009, 1069.30-1068.20 N, 128.30-124.90 E, filled by Deposits 1003, 1004, 1013, and 1015, Skeleton Contexts 1005, 1006, 1011, and 1012, contains Cut 1014) is located in the middle of the south aisle, against Wall 929, and parallel to and cut by Grave 2016-07. The designation of the burials contained by Cuts 1009 and 1014 as Grave 2016-08 is perhaps misleading as the area contained by Cut 1009 likely represents the outer limits of multiple grave cuts that could not be distinguished in the soil at the time of excavation due to repetitive use of the soil for burials within a short period of time. However, as that is what could be recognized, the burials contained in the limits have been defined as belonging to Grave 2016-08. Differences in elevations do allow some discussion of the sequence of burials. At least five individuals were contained in Grave 2016-08, represented by two disarticulated skulls (Skeleton 1005), two partial primary inhumations (Skeleton Contexts 1006 and 1011), and the majority of a third primary inhumation (Skeleton 1012) contained by Cut 1014.; ; Skeleton 1012 is the earliest burial contained within Grave 2016-08. The cut associated with it is Cut 1012, which is within the larger Cut 1009. Cut 993 from Grave 2016-07 truncates the north side of Cut 1012, which mayhave resulted in the cranium associated with Skeleton 1012 having been disturbed by the digging of Grave 2016-07.  As such, the skull of Skeleton 1012 may be with the bone jumble(Skeleton Context 992) of Grave 2016-07. The inhumation (Skeleton 1012) is oriented W-E and consists of the right torso including ribs and some cervical vertebrae but missing the remaining spinal column. The mandible lay more or less on the present cervical vertebrae near a tile that may have been used to prop the head up. The body is not centered within the reconstructed dimensions of the cut, but rather appeared to be set against the north side of the burial space. The trunk was slightly twisted to the south, which caused the lower limbs to also twist to the south, with the left femur and knee at a higher elevation than the right and the left metatarsals and phalanges nestled in the arch of the right foot. The arms were crossed over the chest with the right forearm crossed over the left, but the left hand had somehow bent backwards so that it rested on the dorsal aspect rather than the palmeraspect, which would be expected given the position of the arms. This positioning of the left hand and the relatively constrained position of the body suggests that the individual was wrapped in a shroud at the time of burial. As with many of the other burials in this church, there was a scattering of disarticulated bones in the fill (Context 1004) above Skeleton 1012 including a mandible over the right pelvis.; ; The next burial within Grave 2016-08 was Skeleton 1006, which consists only of the articulated legs and feet of a child. The remains lay above Skeleton 1012, ca. 1.00m from the east edge of Cut 1009, at about the mid-point of Skeleton 1012. The legs were straight with the feet resting on the plantar aspect. The legs were truncated directly below the proximal epiphyses on both the tibiae and fibulae. This truncation was most probably from the construction of Grave 1990-22, which was described as an ossuary in the 1990 field season Notebook 829 in Basket 68. The excavation of the mixed deposits (Contexts 983 and 984) over Grave 2016-07 and Grave 2016-08 included soil from in Grave 1990-22 and produced a number of disarticulated bones from the pit that remained after its excavation. ; ; Grave 1990-22 also truncated Skeleton Contexts 1005 and 1011, which rested at a higher elevation than Skeleton 1005 and thus represent the latest burials within Grave 2016-09. Skeleton Context 1005 consisted of two child crania. These were positioned on either side of a third cranium (Skeleton 1011), which was articulated with some cervical vertebrae, the right clavicle, and Ribs 1-4. The two crania from Skeleton Context 1005 represent two earlier burials in the same space as Skeleton 1011. The crania were high in the most western portion of Grave 2016-08. The truncation of the burial by Grave 1990-22 and root action caused the loss of the lower portion of Skeleton 1011 and any other disarticulated bones that would have been associated with the crania of Context 1005. These burials were directly over the eastern portion of Grave 2016-09 and may have truncated the upper fill of Grave 2016-09 in that area.; ; While all of these burials occurred at different times, they all appear to have been dug through a concrete subfloor (Context 1029; L: 1.86m, W: 0.23m, D: 0.07m) that was exposed at the bottom of fill 1003. The south edge of Cut 1009 clearly cut through this concrete subfloor which is apparent along the middle of Wall 929. The concrete subfloor continues along Wall 929 to the west and was also cut by Grave 2016-09. As this subfloor might belong with the original use of this church, it provides information about the use of the church for burials. The fill (Context 1004) for Grave 2016-08 dates to the 15th century AD based on the pottery representation. Coin2016-166 from this fill dates to the Frankish period, being of William de la Roche and in circulation between 1280 and 1308, which provides a firm terminus post quem within the Frankish period. The other coins (2016-164, -167, and -168) from the context date primarily to the Roman Imperial period with one (Coin 2016-165) dating to the early 3rd century BC. This prevalence of old coins indicates that the fill of these burials was highly mixed and in use over a long period of time. The data from the pottery and the coins of Grave 2016-08 indicate that these burials date to the 15th century AD. However, it may be that the earliest burial, Skeleton 1012, is earlier than this based on its depth in the burial and the lack of a firmly associated fill.; ; ; ; Grave 2016-07; ; Grave 2016-07 (Cut 993, 1070.00-1068.90 N, 128.1-125.65 E, filled by Deposits 989 and 997, Skeleton Contexts 991, 992, 994, and 996; Cut 1000, 1070.00-1069.15 N, 128.00-126.05 E, filled by Skeleton Context 998) is located in the middle section on the north side of the south aisle of the church. This grave was used for at least six burials including one full primary inhumation (Skeleton 994), an articulated left foot with an associated fibula (Skeleton 992), a pile of bones (Skeleton 996), a disarticulated bone jumble (992), and articulated remains of two individuals (Skeleton 998). The order of these burials is complicated, but the presence of articulated remains provides a good place to begin understanding the sequence of events. Due to the number of burial events in this location, Cut 993 likely represents a series of cuts that enlarged the overall grave. The earliest of these burials (Skeleton 998) is within cut (1000) that was truncated by the burials on top of it within Grave 2016-07, contained by Cut 993.; ; The first series of burial events of the grave is represented by Skeleton 998, which consisted of a partially articulated spinal column associated with ribs, a left scapula and a left humerus. The lower portion of the spinal column had shifted south, which disturbed the ribs from that portion. The cervical vertebrae of the spine were resting on top of a curved ceramic tile with thick grooves running parallel. The skeleton was oriented with the cervical (neck) vertebrae in the west and proceeded to the east. This torso had been placed on top of the remains of another burial represented by a right scapula and both humeri. The left humerus was located directly beneath the left humerus of the articulated torso. Therefore, these lower remains probably represent the earliest burial in Grave 2016-07. These or the overlying remains are also likely associated with an articulated right foot found within Cut 1000 at the east end. The small size of the earlier remains suggests a female individual. The laterremains on top of these are more robust and may represent a male individual. These two individuals were contained in Cut 1000. Cut 1000 was defined on its north side by Structure 1002, which is a stone lining along the north edge of Grave 2016-07. However, it is unlikely that Cut 1000 was originally cut for this stone lining nor was Cut 993 (discussed below); neither of which extended beyond the northern limits of the lining.; ; The second series of burial events is represented by Skeleton Contexts 991, 992, 994, and 996, contained by Cut 993.The north side of the grave is partly defined by the stone lining structure 1002. The earliest burials are likely represented by the bones making up Skeleton Context 992, which was a jumble of bones along the east and south sides of the grave. The jumble contained at least three skulls, a number of long bones, and miscellaneous smaller elements. These bones were not as carefully placed on top of the inhumation as in other cases (such as in Grave 2016-03) but were mixed with broken tiles and not laying parallel with the W-E orientation of the primary inhumation (994). Skeleton Context 996, which included a pair of articulated feet and a cranium, represents the next burial event. These remains were found beneath the feet of the primary inhumation (994). The cranium may not be associated with this pair of feet, but it is possible. Skeleton Context 991, consisting of an articulated left foot and fibula, represents a burial that was truncated by the burial of individuals in the same space as Skeletons 992, 996, and 994. It appears to have been a much shallower burial than the other burial events. Within the west end of the bone jumble (992), excavation exposed an object made of small iron balls (pea-size) with short spikes, likely for linking them together. The material and potential reconstruction of the object indicates that it might be a belt.; ; Finally, the primary inhumation (994), was a fully articulated adult, possibly male, individual who was oriented W-E, supine with the head turned slightly to the north. The arms were bent moderately at the elbow with the hands over the pelvis. The shoulders appear to be constricted with the distal ends of the clavicles drawn superiorly and medially. The right forearm was over the left forearm with the right hand resting on the pelvis extended toward the head of the left femur. The left hand was under the right forearm. The legs were straight with the feet flexed, side by side. Three items were excavated with the inhumation including a bone spool (MF-2016-53) found near the left hip and two iron boot heel cleats (MF-2016-71A, MF-2016-71B). The cleats were found in situ essentially on the heels of Skeleton 994, which indicates that they were buried on the individual. ; ; Although the main cut for this grave was not made clear until after the excavation of two fills; (Contexts 983 and 984), the relationship of the grave cut(993) with Cut 985(filled by Deposit984) suggests that Cut 993 began at the level of Cut 985, truncating fill (Context 987) used in the remodeling of the interior church near the end of the Frankish period. The pottery of fill 989 provides a date of the late 14th or early 15th century AD for the burial of inhumation 994. Because Cut 993 truncates the cut(1009) adjacent to Grave 2016-08, which dates to the 15th century based on pottery in its fill (1004), the date for this Grave is the 15th century or later. Coins (2016-155, -157, -159, -160) from fill context 989 are mostly from the Roman Imperial period, but Coin 2016-156 dates to the early Frankish period (1204-1261). The presence of so many old coins indicates that the soil making up this grave fill had been re-deposited a number of times. As in Grave 2016-08, the earliest burials from Grave 2016-07 may date earlier than the 15th century based on their depth in the grave and their association with a different cut (Cut 1000).; ; Post-Medieval Period (Turkish I [1458-1680]); ; Double Burial Grave 2016-05; ; Grave 2016-05 (Cut 968, 1069.50-1069.00 N, 129.90-128.90 E, filled by Contexts 966 and 973, Coffins 972 and 975, and Skeletons 967, 970, and 974) is located in the southeast corner of the church, enclosed by Wall 930, Wall 927, and Wall 929. Wall 929 serves as the southern border of the cut (Context 968). This grave was used for at least three separate juvenile burials (Skeletons 967, 970, and 974). However, it presents a unique case among the graves found in the church thus far as two of the burials were seemingly contemporaneous (Skeletons 970 and 974) in coffins situated side by side in the same cut (Context 968). It is also possible that the individuals died around the same time and the grave was enlarged to accommodate the second individual. ; ; The burial on the north side of the grave (Coffin 972, Skeletons 967 and 970, overlaid by fill 966) contained the remains of a single primary inhumation (Skeleton 970) overlaid by a disarticulated layer of skeletal material (Skeleton 967). The layer of bone (Context 967) consisted of juvenile bones including a fairly intact skull, a number of long bones, ribs, and vertebrae. These bones (Context 967) were situated directly on top of the primary inhumation (Skeleton 970), primarily on the eastern half below the distal end of the femora, with the disarticulated skull sitting just beyond the feet of Skeleton 970. The lines of the coffin (972) became clear as the bone layer (Context 967) and the inhumation (Skeleton 970) were exposed. They were further attested by in situ iron nails positioned along the west, south, and east sides of the inhumation in clear lines. The disarticulated bone layer appears to be confined to the limits of the coffin, which suggests they were placed in the coffin on top of the body. The individual inhumed within the coffin (Skeleton 970) was an infant (ca. 1-year-old based on estimated maximum femoral length), oriented W-E, andlaid in a supine position with a slight twist to the right side (south). The head was turned toward the south on its right side. The arms were bent at the elbow with the hands over the abdomen, right arm over left. The legs were slightly bent at the knee and the feet had fallen to either side to the north and south. The coffin (972) appeared to be too large for the individual as the skeleton only occupied about two-thirds of the coffin space, providing ample space for the disarticulated skeletal material at the east end of the coffin.; ; The burial on the south side of the grave (Coffin 974, Skeleton 974, overlaid by fill 973) was discovered in the course of excavating the northern burial. The presence of another coffin (Coffin 975) was attested by two nails in the SE corner of the northern burial pointed in opposite directions, one to the north and one to the south. It became apparent that the southern nail belonged to a coffin that had been positioned parallel to and flush against the south side of coffin 972. The southern coffin (Context 974) fit snugly between Wall 929 on its southern side and Coffin 972 on its northern side. A series of nails in a line along Wall 929 confirmed the presence of Coffin 975. Coffins 972 and 965 were almost identical in size despite the difference in the size of the children. The inhumation (Skeleton 974) in Coffin 975 was a child(ca. 2.5-3 years old based on estimated maximum femoral length), oriented W-E, and laid in a supine position with the head turned to the south on the right side. The left arm was bent at the elbow and crossed over the chest with the hand over the sternum, but the ulna (part of the forearm) was displaced. The upper right arm was articulated at the right side, but the ulna and radius had been displaced inferiorly and did not appear to be in anatomical position. It is unclear what may have caused these odd displacements. The soil around and filling this grave exhibited a significant amount of root activity, which may have contributed to displacing some elements of the inhumation. The legs are both slightly bent at the knee and turned outwards with the feet turned out as well. Only a few disarticulated remains were found in the vicinity of this inhumation, which contrasts with the bone layer (Context 967) found with skeleton 970.; ; The fills for these inhumations (Contexts 966 and 973) are from the same burial event and were thus considered together for dating and find interpretations. There were no significant finds in the fill, but the pottery provides a Middle Byzantine date. Alternatively, Context 957, located directly above Grave 2016-05, contained a number of iron nails that were likely used for the top portions of Coffins 972 and 975, which means that at least some of the fill belongs to Grave 2016-05. The fill above Grave 2016-05 (Context 957) contained three coins (2016-143, 2016-144, and 2016-145). Coins 2016-143 and 2016-145 date to the 5th century, but Coin 2016-144 dates to 1030-1042 AD. Context 957 also held fragments of a Slipped Plain Glazed bowl and a sgraffito III vessel, which were both dated to the post-medieval period. As discussed above, one piece of rossoanticoand one piece of grey schist were found in Context 957, which may have been part of an overlying Cosmati floor extending across the church during the Frankish period. This suggests that the grave may have been dug through theCosmati-style Frankish floor, thus dating to a later, post-medieval period, as the pottery suggests. This has been further supported by the excavation of Graves 2016-07 and 2016-08 to the west in the middle of the south aisle. The pottery from their fills (989 and 1004) suggests a 15th century AD date. Given the much higher elevation of Grave 2016-05, a post-medieval date would be fitting. Previous excavation in the area from the 1990 field season (NB 828 B69) also exhibits at least one context in an “L” shape along Walls 930 and 927, which indicates that the cut mark was evident at a higher elevation than was defined for its actually excavation. Furthermore, the use of coffins and the differences in the body positions of these burials versus the other burials at lower elevations suggests a change in practice that might be associated with a later date.; ; Architectural Features; ; To learn more about the chronology of the church and its construction, a section in the apse was excavated at a greater depth than the rest of the church interior. This section revealed a number of fill deposits (Contexts 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1042, and 1043) and two working surfaces (Context 1039 and an unexcavated surface). Although much of the church appears to have been used for human burials throughout and after its use as a church, the apse was free of human burial. It did, however, contain a number of animals remains, consisting primarily of sheep/goat and other smaller mammals. The earliest surface (unexcavated) was covered by a deep level of fill (Context 1043), which was 0.53 in depth. This fill had an uneven slope at the top and included a high level of orange-ish/reddish clay inclusions mixed in a clayey silt matrix. It also included large chunks of mortar adhered with limestone. The surface it overlaid was much lighter and harder with mortar around the edges of the apse along Wall 926. The inclusions in the fill level and the characteristics of the surface, suggest that it may have been a working surface on which the debris from dressing the limestone blocks making up the apse wall fell. There appears to be a later working surface (Context 1039) located above this unexcavated surface, which was laid on top of Fill 1042. Fill 1042 was likely used to level the uneven layer of Context 1043. The surface (Context 1039) is covered by Fills 1036 and 1037, which are two artificial levels of the same deposit, with a combined depth of 0.53 (the same as Fill 1043 above the unexcavated working surface). There were a few (ca. 4) flat lying tiles (Context 1038) on the surface of Context 1039. The surface itself consisted primarily of limestone, mortar and plaster, but also contained some tile fragments that may have served to level this surface. Two horizontal cuts were found within the apse wall (Wall 926) on the north (at 84.84m) and south (at 85.00m) sides, which likely represent cuts for scaffolding as the church was being initially constructed.; ; The dates for the fills (Contexts 1043, 1042, 1038, 1037, 1036, 1035) overlying these two working surfaces come primarily from pottery. The pottery from these fills dates mainly to the 12th century. As they are fills, it is likely that the soil used for the deposits had been deposited in many other places prior to the apse. The pottery from Fill 1036, above the later working surface (1039), provides the latest date as the second half of the 12th century.The coins from the fills in the apse date to either the Roman Imperial Period (Coin 2016-187) or to the early Byzantine period (Coin 2016-189). Although these fills and surfaces, provided more information about the construction of the church, it did not yield evidence of the lime-concrete subfloor (Context 1029) found along the middle of the southwall, nor any other floor level. This may indicate that the floor represented by Context 1029 and other potential preceding floors were taken out when the most recent floor, the Cosmati-style floor laid on subfloors 47, 909, 910, 911, and tile (sub?)floor 941.; ; This lime-concrete subfloor (Context 1029) was exposed along the middle of the south wall (Wall 929) of the church during the excavation of Grave 2016-08 (Context 1003). The fill is dated to the 15th century, but the subfloor is likely earlier as Context 1003 was part of Grave 2016-03.  The subfloor was cut (Cut 1014) for the burial of Skeleton 1012, which was the earliest burial of the grave. A scattering of lime-concrete patches was found at about the same elevation (ca. 85.09m) to the east of this subfloor in the southeast corner of the church beneath Context 1033, which indicates that the subfloor continued to the east.; ; Subfloors consisting of concrete, packed pebbles, flat-lying tiles, and mortar for a Cosmati-style floor that extended across the church was exposed by the 1990 field season (NB828, 829, and 835) and was partially excavated in the west nave and NW narthex in the 2014 field season (Context 47). The remainder of the subfloor in the nave (Contexts 909, 910), the transept (Contexts 910, 911, 912, and 913), and SE corner (Structure 941, Context 942) were excavated this season. Evidence of the overlying Cosmati-style flooring was found in the form of two fragments of lapis lacedaimonius in the concrete subfloor context (Context 909), two fragments of rosso antico in the fill layer (Context 918), and one fragment each of rosso antico and grey schist in Context 957. As reported from the 2014 season, the subfloor surrounding the nave likely supported marble slab paving, some of which is still in situ on the north side of the SW Pier Base (Structure 920). ; ; The subfloors were made up of two or, potentially, three layers. In the nave and transept, an upper level consisting of a harder white concrete was observed in the upper layer of Context 909 and by Context 910. The lower level of concrete was softer and included more pebbles, which is seen in the lower level of Context 909 and by Context 913. The floor may have been patched or repaired at some point as Contexts 911 and 912 have different consistencies but are at similar elevation levels. The SE corner is slightly different in that there is an upper level consisting of leveling tiles (Structure 941) and a lower level of concrete/plaster (Context 942). The tiles (Structure 941) may have been used to level the floor for an overlying surface. The pottery for Context 912 provided a date of the 15th or 16th century. The subfloor was dated to the 14th century on the west side in the 2014 season by a fragment of sgraffito IV (Context 47). Therefore, the concrete subfloors and the associated transept threshold (Structure 924) are likely 14th century or later.A cut mark (Cut 919, filled by Deposit 918) associated with the floor on the north side of the nave suggests a difference in flooring between the north aisle and nave. Graves 2016-01, 2016-02, 2016-03, and 2016-06 were excavated from the north aisle. The difference in flooring may be associated with frequent burials in the area as the floors may have been restored after the burial events in some cases (Grave 2016-03, Grave 2016-02).; ; A cement covered, concave threshold exposed in the 1990 field season is situated at the east end of the nave as one enters the transept. The threshold did not have a foundation trench and consisted of two layers of cement with one course of stone tiles between them. The upper layer of cement is concave with medium size stones used to support the concavity on the eastern side. It is likely that this concave portion held half of a column split vertically, which served as the main component of the threshold. Although the pottery excavated with the threshold places the date in the Late Byzantine period (12th century), this threshold may have been constructed during the Frankish renovation of the church which potentially include the concrete bench-like structure (Structure 302) in the NW corner and the Cosmati-style floor installed in the nave. There is no foundation trench associated with it, but a possible leveling fill for the Cosmati floor (Context 918) rested on the same level, indicating that the floor and the threshold may have been contemporaneous. ; ; The altar base (Structure 931) in the transept, across from the apse (Wall 925), may also be contemporaneous with the implementation of the Cosmati-style floor and threshold (Structure 924). The foundation fill (Context 948) was cut (Context 949) into the surface on which Contexts 912 and 913 and Structure 924 were laid. The foundation fill contained pottery dating to the Middle Byzantine period and two coins (2016-140, 2016-141) dating to the 4th and 3rd centuries AD respectively, but its stratigraphic position beneath the subfloors (Contexts 912 and 913), suggests a later date, likely 14th century or later if associated with the construction of the Cosmati-sytle floor. ; ; The threshold area in the middle of the west wall (Wall 21) of the church was excavated to explore the sequence of thresholds and thus use of the church. The earliest threshold is an unexcavated tile structure at 84.37m, which is ca. 0.60m below the earliest subfloor (Context 1029) found in the church. This tile structure was covered by mortar and tiles (Contexts 1040, 1001) which contained pottery dating to the 11th century, but most likely belong to the (early?) Frankish period based on their relationship to the rest of the church. The next, later, level of fill (Context 999) which appeared to have been mixed with mortar, dates to the 15th century based on a fragment of a yellow, slipped plain glazed bowl. The overlying level of fill (Context 995) was located directly beneath the marble threshold (Structure 22), which was in the wall (Wall 20) at the level of its preservation. Fill 995 contained pottery which confirmed the 15th century date of the preceding level (Fill 999). These fills (995 and 999) provide a terminus post quem for the construction of the marble threshold (Structure 22) in the 15th century. The construction of the threshold may have corresponded with the implementation of the Cosmati-style floor.; ; ; Conclusions; ; Excavation of the interior of the church during Sessions II and III has provided further data on the construction and use of the interior of the church (Cosmati-Style Sub-Floor: Contexts 909-913, 941-942; Lime-Cement Sub-Floor: 1029;Interior Threshold: Context 924; Altar Base: Contexts 948, 949, 951; Exterior Threshold: Contexts 22, 995, 999, 1001, 1040) during the 14th and 15th centuries as well as more information about the sequence of burials and their relationship with the interior of the church. Most of the graves discussed here are located beneath this 14th century floor, but it does not appear that they went through that particular floor level. The sequence of burials for Graves 2016-01, 2016-02, 2016-03, 2016-04, 2016-05, and 2016-06 indicate further use of the space as a burial place in the Frankish period, although the chronology is still somewhat unclear. The placement of Grave 2016-01 directly on top of Grave 2016-03 and 2016-02, to some extent, suggests that burial locations were often remembered and reused. Grave 2016-01 was destroyed in the leveling process of the floor supported by thefill of Context 914, but Grave 2016-02 and 2016-03 include cement fragments likely from the cement subfloor (Context 47 and Context 909-913) built during the 14th c. This may indicate that the floor was repaired at some point after the burial of these individuals, which would explain why Grave 2016-01 is so heavily disturbed and why the other two graves include cement chunks in their fills. ; ; The practice of multiple burials exhibited in Graves 2016-03, 2016-09, 2016-07, 2016-08, and 2016-06 seemssimilar to that described for Grave 2014-04 (Kennedy and Cundy 2014) and Grave 1990-41A-C (NB835 B41, 51, 52, 58, 61, 62), which were both located next to the west wall (Wall 20) of the church. Kennedy and Cundy (2014) suggest that the deposition of disarticulated, relatively unbroken bones on top of the primary inhumations may indicate that a particular grave was left open for a certain period of time during which it was reused multiple times for subsequent burials. The unbroken nature of the bones laid directly on top of the inhumation suggests that they were not constantly being covered with fill that might have caused them to be more fractured. There are layers of bones deposited over and/or around the primary inhumations in Graves 2016-03, 2016-06, 2016-07, 2016-08, and 2016-09, but it appears that only Grave 2016-03, Phase II burials might have followed this practice. The bone layer (952) above the inhumation (956) were relatively intact and were laid in a fairly orderly fashion with the long bones laid parallel to the inhumation. However, in Grave 2016-06, the bones of the previous burial appear to have been pushed to one side or not moved at all, which indicates that this grave was not left open. The child burials at the top of Grave 2016-08 similarly appear to not have been left open but reopened for each burial. Grave 2016-07 also exhibits a different practice in that the bone layers/jumbles (Skeleton Contexts 991, 992, and 996) associated with the primary inhumation (Skeleton 994) are much less orderly (i.e. not laid parallel to the orientation of the body) than those of Grave 2016-03 and 2016-09. The articulation of some of the skeletal material from the skeletal contexts of Grave 2016-07 also suggests that the grave was not left open but reopened multiple times. The disorder of the bone jumble (992) supports the argument that the bones were potentially placed in the grave with the fill albeit primarily at the bottom of the fill rather than mixed in with the rest of it. There were a number of bones recovered that had been mixed in with the fill (989). Grave-2016-09 deviates from the other graves in that most of the disarticulated bones were found beside or beneath the primary inhumation, rather than on top of it. This also indicates that the grave was not left open for a period of time for a series of burials.; ; The graves containing adults (2016-03, 2016-07, 2016-08, 2016-09) do appear to be similar in the potential use of a shroud as the arrangement of the skeletons suggests a constrained position within the burial.The burial positions of all of the primary interments mostly concur, with the arms crossed at the chest below the sternum or at the abdomen and the legs laid out straight. There are differences in head position, but these are related primarily to the coffin burials in Grave 2016-05. Every other primary inhumation had either an elevated skull held in place by props on either side of stone or tile. The heads of the burials in Grave 2016-05 are not propped in any way, but are turned southward, to the right side. Many of the graves excavated contained only juvenile remains including Graves 2016-02, 2016-04, 2016-05, and 2016-06. Grave 2016-03, 2016-07, 2016-08, and 2016-09 contained adult remains with most having juvenile bones included in the bone layers of the grave, excepting Grave 2016-08, which contained articulated remains of two juveniles. The peculiarities of Grave 2016-05 cause chronological issues with the relatively high elevation of the grave compared to the other graves, the use of coffins, the side-by-side burials, and the bone layer (Context 967) on top of only one of the inhumations (Skeleton 970). However, the further excavation of the SE corner of the church and an examination of previous excavation in the area does indicate that the burials were established at a later date, likely post medieval,than most of the other excavated burials in the church.; ; The burial of individuals within the church appears to span the currently known period of use of the church (Mid-13th to early 15th c.) (Graves 2016-01, -02, -03, -04, -06, -07, -08, -09) and after it was no longer used (Graves 2016-05). This means that people may have been actively using the floor of the church as a burial place while the church was in use as a place of worship. However, this may also suggest that the church went through at least two periods of use and abandonment. There is evidence that one grave (2016-08) went through an early subfloor (Structure 1029) of the church, which does not appear to have been repaired after the creation of the grave. Grave 2016-09 represents the earliest excavated(this season) primary inhumation of the church, dating to the late 13th century or later. However, this primary inhumation was only the last of many. The skeletons represented in Context 998 are likely earlier than inhumation 1025 but were disturbed by subsequent burial activity in Grave 2016-07. The latest burials are represented in Grave 2016-05. The continuity of the practice of multiple burial is evident throughout the use of the church as a burial area. However, the use of coffins over shrouds and/or tile coverings in Grave 2016-05 also indicates changesin burial practices over time.; ; Recommendations for Future Work in the Area:; ; 1.    Continue the excavation of the osteotheke in the northwest corner of the church nearby Grave 2016-05. It cuts into Context 982, excavated in Session II, identified by Cut 44 and filled by Contexts 32 and 529, excavated in Session I of 2014.; 2.    Determine the nature of the stone block found at the bottom of Grave 2016-06 and whether it is related to Structure 150.; 3.    Determine the nature of the stone lining (Structure 1002) in the north scarp of Grave 2016-07.; 4.    Continue excavation in the south aisle, as there are more articulated burials evident in the bottom of Grave 2016-08 and in the west scarp of Grave 2016-07.; 5.    Excavate the remnants of Grave 2014-04 along the west wall (Wall 21) along with the short wall built specifically for the burial (Wall 1032). This will also allow for completing the excavation of the fill between the threshold and Wall 1032.","Session II and III Final Report: Interior of the Church in Unit 2 of the Frankish Quarter","Report","Corinth","","Corinth:Report:Temple E, Southeast 2016 by Kaitlyn Stiles (2016-05-04 to 2016-06-25)","","","","","Temple E, Southeast 2016 by Kaitlyn Stiles (2016-05-04 to 2016-06-25)","","Corinthia | Ancient Corinth | Central Area | Temple E, Temenos | Temple E, Southeast",""